1989
DOI: 10.1017/s1742758400010365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Indian biotypes of the rice gall midge, Orseolia oryzae (Wood-Mason) (Diptera:Cecidomyiidae)

Abstract: Fourteen differential rice cultivars under four major donor groups were evaluated at 11 field locations in seven Indian states during 13 years against the rice gall midge, Orseolia oryzae (Wood-Mason) (Diptera:Cecidomyiidae). Three basic variations, which qualify to be called biotypes 1,2 and 3 could be identified based on overall reaction patterns against Eswarakora and Siam 29 differential groups. Biotype I cannot damage entries involving either Eswarakora or Siam 29. Biotype 2 is capable of damaging the gro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of damaged plants and silver shoots were recorded. The genotypes were rated either resistant (R) with Ͻ10% plant damage or susceptible (S) with higher damage (Kalode and Bentur 1989). Then, percentage silver shoot at 60 d after transplanting in each genotype was converted to 0 Ð9 scale by using Standard Evaluation System (SES) for rice by International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Banos, Philippines (IRRI 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of damaged plants and silver shoots were recorded. The genotypes were rated either resistant (R) with Ͻ10% plant damage or susceptible (S) with higher damage (Kalode and Bentur 1989). Then, percentage silver shoot at 60 d after transplanting in each genotype was converted to 0 Ð9 scale by using Standard Evaluation System (SES) for rice by International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Banos, Philippines (IRRI 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these genes has been deployed in about one third of the resistant rice varieties developed so far in India. Virulence against Gm1 in the biotype 2 pest population at Cuttack in Orissa state, India and virulence against Gm2 gene in the biotype 3 population at Ranchi in Bihar state, India were recorded even prior to the release of resistant rice varieties (Kalode and Bentur 1989). Subsequent to extensive cultivation of resistant rice varieties, virulence against these genes has been reported from different pest endemic regions of the country, including the combined virulence against the Gm1 and Gm2 genes in biotype 4 (Bentur et al 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Damages to rice from this insect has been reported from Bangladesh (Catling et al 1978), Cambodia (Jahn and Bunnarith 2004) and China (Pasalu et al 2004), to India (Kalode and Bentur 1989), Indonesia (Kartohardjono 1979), Lao PDR (Inthavong et al 2004), Sri Lanka (Kudagamage et al 1988, and Thailand (Hidaka et al 1974). The gall midge causes deformation of growing point of the rice plant, turning the leaf into a tube-like gall, called 'silver shoot' or 'onion leaf', the capacity to develop a panicle and produce grain is lost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the farmer's field at Mae Moot, where infestation of the susceptible check variety SPT1 was 33%, 70% of the accessions were resistant. Variation in susceptibility to gall midge among rice varieties, and that susceptibility in rice depends on both the rice variety and gall midge biotype, are well documented (Kalode and Bentur 1989;Nwilene et al 2002). Rice varieties have also been reported to respond differently to gall midge from different locations in Thailand (Tayathum et al 1995).…”
Section: Gall Midge Resistance and Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%