2002
DOI: 10.1002/jps.10159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Ibuprofen as a Nontraditional Plasticizer of Ethyl Cellulose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(16 reference statements)
3
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Wafers with larger pores allow a more rapid ingress of water during dissolution which is expected to increase drug release rates. Figure 4a shows that addition of IBU increased the work of compression (WOC) [17] while PM decreased it to approximately half that of IBU loaded wafers, and also lower than the blank (non drug loaded wafer). These results combined with SEM observations showed that addition of PM decreased mechanical strength due possibly to the reduced availability of free polymer as a result of the higher amounts of PM distributed throughout the matrix.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscopy (Sem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wafers with larger pores allow a more rapid ingress of water during dissolution which is expected to increase drug release rates. Figure 4a shows that addition of IBU increased the work of compression (WOC) [17] while PM decreased it to approximately half that of IBU loaded wafers, and also lower than the blank (non drug loaded wafer). These results combined with SEM observations showed that addition of PM decreased mechanical strength due possibly to the reduced availability of free polymer as a result of the higher amounts of PM distributed throughout the matrix.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscopy (Sem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HME process was conducted at 140°C, to produce smooth extrudates at two different IBU loading levels of 25 and 40%. Eudragit® E PO was selected as the primary matrix-forming polymer, and plasticizers were not used in this formulation because IBU has been shown to possess plasticizing effects comparable to traditional plasticizers (52). The extrudates were analyzed using XRD to examine the IBU crystallinity, and the results showed that even at the high drug loading (40%) level, IBU remained in an amorphous state.…”
Section: Taste Maskingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used traditional plasticizers are triacetin (48), citrate ester (41,49), vitamin E D-alpha tocopheryl PEG 1000 succinate (TPGS) (50), surfactants (51), and lowmolecular-weight polyethylene glycols (31). Non-traditional plasticizers are included in formulations to serve other critical functions and are often low-molecular-weight materials such as the active substance itself (52)(53)(54)(55). Special plasticizers are low-molecular-weight materials, which also act as plasticizers for polymeric carriers depending on their physical state.…”
Section: Plasticizersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plasticizing effect can be attributed to the increase of free volume, the decrease of friction between polymer chains and the consequent improvement of chain mobility of polymer, resulting in reducing the drug and polymeric carrier degradation and improve the stability profile of the active compound (Aharoni, 1998). IBU, a low melting point drug (78 °C), with a known plasticizing effect, and higher IBU loading led to subsequent increase in its plasticizing effect as reported previously with different polymers such as Kollidon ® SR (De Brabander et al, 2002;Kidokoro et al, 2001;Özgüney et al, 2009). Therefore, IBU is considered a good candidate for HME technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%