2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of human sperm populations using conventional parameters, surface ubiquitination, and apoptotic markers

Abstract: Objective: To directly compare distinct assays proposed to monitor human sperm quality and possibly preselect sperm populations for assisted reproductive technology (ART). Design: Analysis of human sperm sample quality using several methodologies. Setting: Academic and clinical institutions. Patient(s): Samples from consenting patients undergoing routine semen analysis or ART. Interventions: Human sperm samples were analyzed in terms of World Health Organization parameters and processed for annexin V, terminal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
41
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, our results are also consistent with this report which shows a concomitant increase in ubiquitination and annexin staining [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, our results are also consistent with this report which shows a concomitant increase in ubiquitination and annexin staining [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…PS exposure can be monitored using fluorescent Annexin V in unpermeabilised (live) cells. In fact, Annexin V staining revealed more viable cells in normozoospermic patients (Varum et al 2007) and seemed to correlate with sperm parameters in other studies (Shen et al 2002, Weng et al 2002. Importantly, the use of magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) with Annexin V microbeads to select sperm reduced the percentage of altered cells (Lee et al 2010, Rawe et al 2010, Tavalaee et al 2012.…”
Section: Apoptosismentioning
confidence: 82%
“…By reviewing studies conducted in raw semen from similar groups Muciaccia et al 2007;O'Flaherty et al 2008;Cohen-Bacrie et al 2009;Tunc et al 2008;Martin et al 2005Formaldeyde d Muratori et al 2003Caglar et al 2007;Tarozzi et al 2009;Domínguez-Fandos et al 2007;Young et al 2003;Avendañ o et al 2009a and2009b;Stronati et al 2006;Ramos et al 2008;Tesarik et al 2004 Permeabilization with detergents Absent Martin et al 2005;O'Flaherty et al 2008;Young et al 2003;Said et al 2006Present e Chohan et al 2006Aoki et al 2006;Caglar et al 2007;Varum et al 2007;Muratori et al 2008a andTunc et al 2008;Frydman et al 2008;Avendañ o et al 2009a and2009b Labelling Direct labeling f O'Flaherty et al 2008;Zhang et al 2008;Aoki et al 2006;Torregrosa et al 2006;Young et al 2003;Muratori et al 2008a;.Greco et al 2005;Paasch et al 2004;Brugnon et al 2006;Donnelly et al 2000 Indirect labeling g Varum et al 2007;Sergerie et al 2005;P...…”
Section: Comparing Flow Cytometry and Fluorescence Microscopy For Spementioning
confidence: 99%