1995
DOI: 10.1109/10.364516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of human gait by means of body center of mass oscillations derived from ground reaction forces

Abstract: Ground reaction forces from two force plates are used to determine the cyclic oscillations of the body center of mass while walking at preferred speed. Good approximations to the oscillations may be obtained from formulae containing just the first- and second-order Fourier coefficients of the combined left-right ground reaction forces taken over a complete walking cycle. The symmetric components of the oscillations have consistent mutual phase relations for normal subjects, so that the amplitudes alone can be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies agree that changes in walking speed are associated with increases in the intensity of muscle activation [70,[81][82][83][84][85]. The results of this study show that speed differences obtained between subjects were not related to MG EMGa and GRF.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Several studies agree that changes in walking speed are associated with increases in the intensity of muscle activation [70,[81][82][83][84][85]. The results of this study show that speed differences obtained between subjects were not related to MG EMGa and GRF.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, it leads the head to bend in one direction–and, as a consequence, also the trunk, slightly–to fit its inclination. Moreover, arm swing is altered [31], as one arm natural swing is restricted by keeping the phone close to the ear; overall, the center of mass moves to the side where the phone is held, thus leading to a higher gait asymmetry, causing a lower harmonic ratio along the mediolateral direction [32–34], as the consequence of the increased presence of odd harmonics relative to the even ones [35]. This may be why step regularity and symmetry along the ML direction appeared different when talking as compared to baseline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this second pose, the CM model error was still small (~3·mm). At a self-selected gait speed, the body's CM oscillates with a peak-topeak amplitude of between 4 and 5·cm in the medio-lateral (x) direction (Crowe et al, 1995). Thus, the estimated CM model error was less than 10% of these oscillations.…”
Section: Error Estimatementioning
confidence: 98%