2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2010.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of highly porous nanoparticle deposits by permeance measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before the two layer sections get into contact, the openings in the top layer are already significantly narrowed or even completely clogged, preventing thus a further deposition of the particles onto the glass substrate (see Supporting Information Figure S5). Our experimental observations are consistent with those found in a pressure-drop-driven particle-filtration/deposition model reported by Elmøe et al [29] However, in our work, the particle deposition is driven mainly by the high temperature-gradient between the gas flow and the water-cooled substrate, while in the model by Elmøe et al, no temperature-gradient was applied. Although there is no vertical flow of particle-laden gas through the substrate in our process, the symmetrical deposition of particles on the walls of the micropatterned holes seems not to be influenced by the horizontal gas-flow over the substrate due to a formation of stagnation boundary layer.…”
Section: Analyses Of the Cma-fsp Particle Deposition Processsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before the two layer sections get into contact, the openings in the top layer are already significantly narrowed or even completely clogged, preventing thus a further deposition of the particles onto the glass substrate (see Supporting Information Figure S5). Our experimental observations are consistent with those found in a pressure-drop-driven particle-filtration/deposition model reported by Elmøe et al [29] However, in our work, the particle deposition is driven mainly by the high temperature-gradient between the gas flow and the water-cooled substrate, while in the model by Elmøe et al, no temperature-gradient was applied. Although there is no vertical flow of particle-laden gas through the substrate in our process, the symmetrical deposition of particles on the walls of the micropatterned holes seems not to be influenced by the horizontal gas-flow over the substrate due to a formation of stagnation boundary layer.…”
Section: Analyses Of the Cma-fsp Particle Deposition Processsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As shown in Figure 5D, lifting off the ceramic mask after the deposition process may rupture the continuous layer and leave a pyramid behind with a cut-off tip, as depicted in Figure 5F. Our experimental observations are consistent with those found in a pressure-drop-driven particle-filtration/deposition model reported by Elmøe et al [29] However, in our work, the particle deposition is driven mainly by the high temperature-gradient between the gas flow and the water-cooled substrate, while in the model by Elmøe et al, no temperature-gradient was applied. [28] For masks with features of low aspect ratios ( 2) as shown in Figure 3G and H, a ruptured deposit structure will not be formed.…”
Section: Analyses Of the Cma-fsp Particle Deposition Processsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Note that the mass of EC cannot be transformed into moles as EC is not a well-defined molecule characterized by its own molecular weight. Results highlighted a high level of correlation (R 2 > 0.9); despite this, for a prognostic model, the amount of water molecules [18] and the cake structure [89][90][91] should be quantitatively accounted for in future works.…”
Section: Generated Aerosols Conductance Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…SMPS data were collected at the inlet of the PTFE filter holder to be representative of the real size distribution deposited onto the PTFE filters (average residence time of particles into the chambers: 6.7 min). Finally, the cake deposits were characterized as reported in literature [89][90][91] from SMPS data determining first the a-dimensionless Peclet number (Pe) and the following cake porosity (ε) as detailed in Thomas et al [91]:…”
Section: Laboratory Generated Ec and Saline Aerosolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). This approach was previously validated ,, and has shown that this leads to particle deposition and film growth in the diffusion and ballistic regimes. This simulates and maps the vertical growth of a nanoparticle-agglomerate film from the substrate, up to at least 3.6 μm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%