1981
DOI: 10.1016/0097-3165(81)90007-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of H(n, q) by the parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By Lemma 5.3, we need not treat the case p=&1, so suppose p=1. Then the intersection numbers given in Lemma 5.2 are exactly those of the Hamming graph H(d, q), so that the graph is isomorphic to H(d, q) or the Doob graph by [31,15]. Now suppose that a 1 =0.…”
Section: And1mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…By Lemma 5.3, we need not treat the case p=&1, so suppose p=1. Then the intersection numbers given in Lemma 5.2 are exactly those of the Hamming graph H(d, q), so that the graph is isomorphic to H(d, q) or the Doob graph by [31,15]. Now suppose that a 1 =0.…”
Section: And1mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…If q = 1, then by [8,Lemma 5.2] has the parameters of a Hamming graph. So by [11] is isomorphic to a Hamming graph or an Egawa graph. But by [7,Theorem 3.8], is thin and so by [16], is not an Egawa graph.…”
Section: The Parameters Of γmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many contributions to this problem (e.g. [5] for the Hamming schemes, [11,14] for the Johnson schemes, [13] for the q-analogue Johnson schemes, [9] for the dual polar schemes, [8,10] for the forms schemes and so on), but almost all of them concern P-(and Q-) polynomial schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%