2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of gaseous and semi-volatile organic compounds emitted from field burning of rice straw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Emission factors of SO 2 were 0.07 ± 0.07, 0.99 ± 1.53 and 0.72 ± 0.34 g kg −1 for rice, corn and wheat straw. Our measured emission factors of SO 2 were lower than those reported by Cao et al (2008) and Kim Oanh et al (2015) for rice straw, but higher than those reported by Cao et al (2008) for corn and wheat straw. Due to low sulfur contents in crop straws, the SO 2 emission factors for open burning of crop residues were much lower than those for domestic coal combustion, which were determined to be 2.43-5.36 g kg −1 for raw bituminous coal (Du et al, 2016).…”
Section: Oa Production Predictioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Emission factors of SO 2 were 0.07 ± 0.07, 0.99 ± 1.53 and 0.72 ± 0.34 g kg −1 for rice, corn and wheat straw. Our measured emission factors of SO 2 were lower than those reported by Cao et al (2008) and Kim Oanh et al (2015) for rice straw, but higher than those reported by Cao et al (2008) for corn and wheat straw. Due to low sulfur contents in crop straws, the SO 2 emission factors for open burning of crop residues were much lower than those for domestic coal combustion, which were determined to be 2.43-5.36 g kg −1 for raw bituminous coal (Du et al, 2016).…”
Section: Oa Production Predictioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Akagi et al (2011) updated the emission data for 14 types of biomass burning, and newly identified species were included. Since biomass types and combustion conditions may differ in different studies, reported emission factors are highly variable, especially for agricultural residue burning (Li et al, 2007(Li et al, , 2017Cao et al, 2008;Zhang et al, 2008;Yokelson et al, 2011;Brassard et al, 2014;Sanchis et al, 2014;Ni et al, 2015;Kim Oanh et al, 2015;Stockwell et al, 2016;Bruns et al, 2017;Tkacik et al, 2017). Moreover, previous studies on agricultural residue burning were mostly carried out near fire spots or in chambers with low dilution ratios.…”
Section: Z Fang Et Al: Open Burning Of Rice Corn and Wheat Strawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, various studies reported the emission factors measured in laboratory or field measurements, often varied widely in different experiments, as summarized in Table 1. In brackets are the all emission factors values derived by Kim Oanh, N. T. et al (2011) [31], except SO 2 derived from Kim Oanh, N. T. et al (2015) [32]. The field burning experiments were conducted in the Pathum thani province which is located in the central part of Thailand.…”
Section: Assessment Of Emissions From Rice Residue Open Burningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kanokkanjana, K. and Garivait, S. (2010) [40] developed the emission factor of CO 2 , CO, and PM 2.5 for rice residue burning by field experiment in Thailand during 2007 to 2010. However, the emission factors from recent or local measurements were employed in this study derived from Kim Oanh, N. T. et al (2011) [31] and Kim Oanh, N. T. et al (2015) [32], concerning the fact that it represents the average emission factor of rice straw burning of Thailand for all emission species focused in this study. The emission factors were estimated to be 1177 ± 140 g/kg for CO 2 , 93 ± 10 g/kg for CO, 0.49 ± 0.21 g/kg for NO X , 0.51 ± 0.32 g/kg for SO 2 , 8.3 ± 2.2 g/kg for PM 2.5 , 9.4 ± 3.5 g/kg for PM 10 , 0.53 g/kg for BC, and 3.1 g/kg for OC.…”
Section: Assessment Of Emissions From Rice Residue Open Burningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation