2004
DOI: 10.1149/1.1796447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Ferrite-Austenite Boundary Region of Duplex Stainless Steels by SAES

Abstract: Scanning Auger electron spectroscopy (SAES) has been used to investigate the phase boundary region between ferrite and austenite in three duplex stainless steels. Of the elements investigated Cr and Mo are partitioned to the ferrite phase, while Ni and N are partitioned to the austenite phase. The composition gradient across the phase boundary occurs within a few micrometers. The results are in accordance with previous results of the same phase boundary region obtained with complementary techniques. They form … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To clarify the detailed composition gradient across the boundary regions, further studies are necessary, using high-resolution analytical techniques such as TEM 34 and microscopic Auger electron spectroscopy. 35 In this study, the SKPFM measurements of different IMPs revealed that the Volta potential may also vary with the IMPs size. A high-resolution scan was performed for the nanometer-sized IMPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To clarify the detailed composition gradient across the boundary regions, further studies are necessary, using high-resolution analytical techniques such as TEM 34 and microscopic Auger electron spectroscopy. 35 In this study, the SKPFM measurements of different IMPs revealed that the Volta potential may also vary with the IMPs size. A high-resolution scan was performed for the nanometer-sized IMPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…ecsdl.org/site/terms_use address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see 138.251.14 35. Downloaded on 2014-11-17 to IP…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates existence of a driving force for galvanic interaction between both phases, with expected onset of electrochemical activity at interphase boundaries and dissolution towards the ferrite. Differences in ΔΨ generally indicate a driving force for galvanic interaction, whereas local potential hot-spots or regions with steep potential changes (gradients) indicate susceptible sites for localised corrosion [31]. Selective corrosion attack in duplex stainless steel has frequently been observed on ferrite to occur in mild chloride-bearing environments, with nucleation at or in the vicinity of ferrite-austenite interphase boundaries, whilst austenite showed less corrosion and stress corrosion cracking susceptibility [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After exposures to ALF and citric acid in which manganese was released to a large extent, no manganese was detected in the outermost surface oxide. Instead, metallic nickel was detected by means of XPS, indicative of its presence beneath a thin surface oxide (Femenia et al 2004;Marcus and Oudar 1995). Oxidized chromium was strongly enriched in the outermost surface oxide after exposure to these solutions with 50-60 wt% Cr/(Fe?Cr?Ni?Mn) for both particle size fractions in both ALF and citric acid, compared with 17-19 wt% in the bulk.…”
Section: Complexation-induced Reductive Metal Release and Concordant mentioning
confidence: 99%