2008
DOI: 10.1038/jes.2008.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of exposures among cemented tungsten carbide workers. Part II: Assessment of surface contamination and skin exposures to cobalt, chromium and nickel

Abstract: Cobalt, chromium and nickel are among the most commonly encountered contact allergens in the workplace, all used in the production of cemented tungsten carbides (CTC). Exposures to these metal-containing dusts are frequently associated with skin sensitization and/or development of occupational asthma. The objectives of this study were to assess the levels of cobalt, chromium and nickel on work surfaces and on workers' skin in three CTC production facilities. At least one worker in each of 26 work areas (among … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(29) With regards to ACD, generation of ·OH radicals by milligram quantities of cobalt powder in an artificial sweat plus H 2 O 2 reaction system supports the plausibility of radical generation on the skin stratum corneum. Whether radical generation and potential alteration of biomolecules to form hapten (26) occurs in the underlying immunologically active epidermis skin layer could not be elucidated from our data and remains poorly understood.…”
Section: Allergic Contact Dermatitismentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(29) With regards to ACD, generation of ·OH radicals by milligram quantities of cobalt powder in an artificial sweat plus H 2 O 2 reaction system supports the plausibility of radical generation on the skin stratum corneum. Whether radical generation and potential alteration of biomolecules to form hapten (26) occurs in the underlying immunologically active epidermis skin layer could not be elucidated from our data and remains poorly understood.…”
Section: Allergic Contact Dermatitismentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A follow-on study of personal exposures revealed respirable size cobalt-and tungsten-containing particles in all work areas that span the production of cemented tungsten carbides. (28) Day et al (29) evaluated dermal exposures of employees engaged in the manufacture of cemented tungsten carbides and reported substantial cobalt contamination on workers' hands and necks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objectives of this study were to better understand hazard potential by relating mechanisms of CTC-induced adverse health to characteristics of cobalt-and tungsten-containing aerosols generated during the manufacture of hard metal with emphasis on (1) aerosol total and particle size-selective mass concentrations; (2) particle size distributions; and (3) comparison of mass concentration obtained using personal ''total'' dust and personal size-selective impactor samplers. In the companion paper, we present the results of the assessment of work surfaces contamination and skin exposure to cobalt, chromium, and nickel (Day et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The duration was selected as a typical 8 hour work shift plus additional time to account for take-home exposure which is a common occurrence in the ‘real-world.’ In our experiences with dermal exposure assessments in facilities that lacked skin protection and hygiene programs, take-home contamination was evident and metals were still present on workers’ skin at the start of their shift the following day. 24 For each study material, masses equivalent to 0.05 g of metal were accurately weighed to 0.01 mg using a microbalance (Model AX-205, Mettler-Toledo) housed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled room. The chosen mass value exceeds dermal loadings that we have observed previously 24 but the high mass value was needed to exceed analytical detection limits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%