1989
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of exposure to molds and actinomycetes in agricultural dusts by scanning electron microscopy, fluorescence microscopy and the culture method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(16 reference statements)
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fluorescence microscopy. Fluorescence microscopy has been applied both to look at the autofluorescence of PBAP (Po¨hlker et al, 2011), and especially with the use of fluorescent dye labelling (Karlsson and Malmberg, 1989;Hernandez et al, 1999). The most common traditional method for determining the total count of environmental microorganism is direct fluorescence microscopy, either by taking advantage of the autofluorescence of certain biological compounds or by using samples that have been treated with a fluorescent dye, most commonly 4.6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) or acridine orange (Francisco et al, 1973;Hobbie et al, 1977;Kepner and Pratt, 1994;Matthias-Maser and Jaenicke, 1995;Harrison et al, 2005).…”
Section: Light Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fluorescence microscopy. Fluorescence microscopy has been applied both to look at the autofluorescence of PBAP (Po¨hlker et al, 2011), and especially with the use of fluorescent dye labelling (Karlsson and Malmberg, 1989;Hernandez et al, 1999). The most common traditional method for determining the total count of environmental microorganism is direct fluorescence microscopy, either by taking advantage of the autofluorescence of certain biological compounds or by using samples that have been treated with a fluorescent dye, most commonly 4.6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) or acridine orange (Francisco et al, 1973;Hobbie et al, 1977;Kepner and Pratt, 1994;Matthias-Maser and Jaenicke, 1995;Harrison et al, 2005).…”
Section: Light Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infrared vibrational spectroscopy has also been widely used for pollen identification (Pappas et al, 2003;Gottardini et al, 2007;Dell'Anna et al, 2009;Zimmermann, 2010). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been particularly useful at the investigation of PBAP, allowing a close look at the morphology and surface of particles (Karlsson and Malmberg, 1989;Wittmaack et al, 2005;Coz et al, 2010;Po¨schl et al, 2010;Gilardoni et al, 2011).…”
Section: Light Detection and Ranging (Lidar) And Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the culturability obtained in our measurements was greater than the culturable bioaerosol levels reported by some other investigators. For instance, Karlsson and Malmberg (1989) found culturability of approximately 17% including bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi together in an agricultural environment. Eduard et al (1990) reported that the culturability of fungi in a sawmill and a pig confinement ranged from 3% to 98%.…”
Section: Culturabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In farm buildings, viable spore concentrations have been reported to vary between lo2 and 10'' colony-forming units (cFu) . m-3 depending on the type of farming (dairy, pig, or poultry farming) and phases of work (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). In the studies, the species Aspergillus (eg, A glaucus group and A fumigntus), Penicilliunz, Clndosporium, Rhizopus, Mucor, Paecilomyces, Alternaria, Absidia, Botrytis, and Scopulnriopsis and yeasts have been observed to be the most common airborne fungi.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fungal spores originate from different sources in the agricultural environment. Laboratory and experimental studies have indicated that the same fungal species that are identified in hay, grain, straw, silage, wood shavings, and sawdust are also detected in the air samples collected during the handling of the same materials (6,(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%