2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of estrogen-responsive epithelial cell lines and their infectivity by genital Chlamydia trachomatis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alterations of chlamydial protein secretion may allow C. trachomatis to achieve intracellular survival upon ampicillin exposure, therefore protecting the bacteria from innate and acquired immunity. Our in vitro primary human endocervical epithelial cell model provides a valuable tool to investigate host cell factors that are relevant to the establishment of persistence, as this model most likely retains the appropriate responsiveness to endogenous factors, such as female steroid hormones that can be altered in transformed cervical cell lines (Guseva et al, 2005). While this study has focused on selective chlamydial secretable proteins, a broader proteomic analysis is warranted to elucidate how the overall secretome affects the infection process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alterations of chlamydial protein secretion may allow C. trachomatis to achieve intracellular survival upon ampicillin exposure, therefore protecting the bacteria from innate and acquired immunity. Our in vitro primary human endocervical epithelial cell model provides a valuable tool to investigate host cell factors that are relevant to the establishment of persistence, as this model most likely retains the appropriate responsiveness to endogenous factors, such as female steroid hormones that can be altered in transformed cervical cell lines (Guseva et al, 2005). While this study has focused on selective chlamydial secretable proteins, a broader proteomic analysis is warranted to elucidate how the overall secretome affects the infection process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This intriguing difference between strains may possibly be due to the recognition of and binding to different receptor molecules on host cell surfaces that, for serovar E, may be enriched or clustered in some regions or microdomains of polarized epithelial cell apical membranes, such as lipid rafts or caveolae, proposed to be involved in serovar E but not in serovar L2 entry [19,20]. Although their role in chlamydial entry is still controversial [21][22][23], it is an interesting possibility, as many pathogens are known to interact with these membrane microdomains and that receptor molecules, such as membrane-associated estrogen receptors that locate to caveolae, have been implicated in serovar E attachment/entry [11,24]. In contrast, initial interactions of serovar L2 EB with host cell surfaces may occur via recognition of a broader range of host molecules or molecules widely represented throughout cell surfaces, such as heparan sulfate proteoglycans [25], and/or via Tarp-mediated pedestallike formation [26,27], a phenomenon shown to be more prevalent for serovar L2 than with serovar D [26] or serovar E [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, C. trachomatis serovar E EB progeny recovered from McCoy cell fibroblasts grown on collagen-coated microcarrier beads in a 3D culture system were higher in numbers and more infectious on a per particle ratio basis, because of an accelerated developmental cycle, compared to the progeny collected from McCoy cells grown in flasks [9,10]; in addition, the harvested chlamydiae always exhibited significantly higher infectious titers in more relevant genital epithelial cells than in McCoy cells. An epithelial cell environment appears important for optimal chlamydial growth but the anatomical origin of the cell lines used seems to be critical as well, as emphasized by recent studies [11,12]. For instance, Miyairi et al [12] showed that cell lines originating from different anatomical sites, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two micrograms of total RNA from all bead culture samples was then reverse transcribed using the SuperScript II kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) in the presence of 200 ng of random hexamers (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA) under the conditions recommended by the manufacturer. Prior to qPCR, the quality of all cDNA was checked by conventional PCR with primers specific for human aldolase as previously described (21). In addition, for each RNA sample, an "RT-minus" control, in which the reverse transcriptase (RT) enzyme was omitted, was also included.…”
Section: Vol 75 2007 C Trachomatis Growth Varies In Polarized Epitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, chlamydial infection in various polarized epithelial cell lines also differs. C. trachomatis serovar E infectivity is greater for the endometrial carcinoma epithelial subclone HEC-1B than for the Ishikawa endometrial epithelial cell line and the two breast cancer epithelial cell lines MCF-7 and HCC-1806 (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%