2000
DOI: 10.1006/fmic.2000.0350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from spoiled dry-cured hams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the Enterobacteriaceae counts obtained in VRBGA medium, 26.7% of the spoiled hams had counts greater than 2 log CFU g −1 , whereas in the control hams the counts were lower than 2 log CFU g −1 . This microbial group has also been reported at levels of 2 to 6 log CFU g −1 in spoiled Iberian dry‐cured hams (García and others 2000; Losantos and others 2000), so that these microorganisms can be attributed a major role in spoilage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the Enterobacteriaceae counts obtained in VRBGA medium, 26.7% of the spoiled hams had counts greater than 2 log CFU g −1 , whereas in the control hams the counts were lower than 2 log CFU g −1 . This microbial group has also been reported at levels of 2 to 6 log CFU g −1 in spoiled Iberian dry‐cured hams (García and others 2000; Losantos and others 2000), so that these microorganisms can be attributed a major role in spoilage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The counts were less than 3 log CFU g −1 in unspoiled hams, whereas the spoiled hams had maximum counts of 6 log CFU g −1 . These microorganisms have been identified as predominant during most of the ripening time in the normal processing of different types of dry‐cured hams (Huerta and others 1988; Rodríguez and others 1994; Losantos and others 2000). In unspoiled Iberian hams, GPCP counts of 4 log CFU g −1 have been found in deep tissues at the end of the post‐salting period (Rodríguez and others 1994).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are the most commonly found genus in meat products and often contribute to spoilage ( Doulgeraki et al, 2011 , 2012 ). Serratia liquefaciens was found in high numbers after refrigerated storage of packages of minced meat, such that they actually could spoil the product ( Lindberg et al, 1998 ), and comprised one of the most common species of Enterobacteria in spoiled hams ( Paarup et al, 1999 ; Losantos et al, 2000 ), where they typically reached 5–7 log 10 CFU/g ( Gram et al, 1999 ). In this study, Figure 3C illustrates that the Serratia populations grew rapidly and reached a peak to become dominant on day 15, then reached their stationary phase and suppressed the growth of other spoilage organisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). While few literatures could be found about the effect of actinomycetes on ham quality, bacteria, except for some micrococci and lactobacteria, were usually thought to be harmful to human health and cause hams spoiled (De Martinis & Freitas, 2003;Losantos, Sanabria, Cornejo, & Carrascosa, 2000;Portocarrero, Newman, & Mikel, 2002;Rodríguez et al, 1994).…”
Section: Natural Microflora Of Xuanwei Hammentioning
confidence: 98%