Alternative Lithographic Technologies 2009
DOI: 10.1117/12.814968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of electrostatic chucks for extreme ultraviolet lithography

Abstract: The use of an electrostatic chuck to support and flatten an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) mask during scanning exposure will be a critical component to meet the stringent requirements on image placement errors in the sub-30-nm regime. Consequently, the ability to predict the response of the mask during e-chucking is necessary for the design and implementation of the e-chuck system. This research focuses on characterizing the coefficient of friction between the EUV reticle and the dielectric material of the chuck. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamic friction was found to be only marginally smaller than static friction and values in the range from 0.27 to 0.33 were obtained for the static friction coefficient under vacuum conditions. These values are a bit lower, but not far from previous friction results for an Alumina pin chuck on a CrN metallised mask blank 6 were static coefficients of friction around 0.35 were observed. The difference might well be related to the different material and surface conditions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Dynamic friction was found to be only marginally smaller than static friction and values in the range from 0.27 to 0.33 were obtained for the static friction coefficient under vacuum conditions. These values are a bit lower, but not far from previous friction results for an Alumina pin chuck on a CrN metallised mask blank 6 were static coefficients of friction around 0.35 were observed. The difference might well be related to the different material and surface conditions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…The development of EUV lithography systems has driven increased interest in characterization of different electrostatic chucking mechanisms and their capabilities, but previous reports have largely focused on mask chucking. [5][6][7] As a result, there is a critical need to better understand the mechanics of the wafer chucking process and the role of wafer geometry in chuck performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%