2015
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2015.1017550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Dust Particles’ 3D Shape and Roughness with Nanometer Resolution

Abstract: Mineral dust particles in the atmosphere are often aspherical and their shape is important for a multitude of processes. Yet, measurements of the true shape in three dimensions are rare, even in a laboratory setting. Here, we employ atomic force microscopy to determine the 3D shape and surface roughness for two dusts commonly used in laboratory experiments, Arizona test dust (ATD) and kaolinite. Our major finding is that both are thin and remarkably smooth. An oblate spheroidal description is an excellent fit … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the AR of North African dust might thus be larger than that of Asian dust (p value = 0.001 from Student's t test), this regional difference is 10.1029/2019GL086592 In the legend, the numbers in parentheses denote the numbers of analyzed individual dust particles. Chou et al (2008) and Woodward et al (2015) have two numbers with the first one denoting the number of analyzed dust particles for AR and the second one for HWR. In (c) and (e), Chou et al (2008) is not used in regressions due to the insignificant number of analyzed particles for HWR.…”
Section: Measurement Compilation Of Dust Shape Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the AR of North African dust might thus be larger than that of Asian dust (p value = 0.001 from Student's t test), this regional difference is 10.1029/2019GL086592 In the legend, the numbers in parentheses denote the numbers of analyzed individual dust particles. Chou et al (2008) and Woodward et al (2015) have two numbers with the first one denoting the number of analyzed dust particles for AR and the second one for HWR. In (c) and (e), Chou et al (2008) is not used in regressions due to the insignificant number of analyzed particles for HWR.…”
Section: Measurement Compilation Of Dust Shape Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (d) and (f), the errors of African dust are not shown due to only one measurement of HWR (Jeong et al, 2016). Results of measurements of processed or artificial dust (Matsuki et al, 2010;Sakai et al, 2010;Woodward et al, 2015) are shown for completeness, but because their representativeness to real mineral dust aerosols is unclear, these studies are not used in the groupings in (b), (d), and (f) or in regressions in (a), (c), and (e).…”
Section: Measurement Compilation Of Dust Shape Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, derivation of the true three-dimensional shape requires application of atomic force microscopy (e.g. Chou et al, 2008;Woodward et al, 2015), or stereogrammetry from electron microscope images (Lindqvist et al, 2014). Internal structures can be analyzed, e.g., by slicing open dust particles with a focused ion beam, as done by Jeong and Nousiainen (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations are consistent with previously reported values. 71,[74][75][76] The IN-ESEM platform provides the capability to identify the location of ice nucleation events within individual particles and is capable of capturing early stages of ice formation and its dynamic evolution. Fig.…”
Section: Isothermal Ice Nucleation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%