1986
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.1986.1064264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of dropouts with data read-back errors for digital magnetic-tape recorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peak shift errors are more characteristic of magnetic recording channels than other channels. Although Seymour [41] states that dropouts-additive errors that change a "1" to a "0"-are the "primary cause of data errors in high-density magnetic recording," other analyses [42] suggest that peak shifts are the most prevalent class of errors for recording channels. A peak shift happens when a "1" in the data, corresponding to a transition in the magnetization pattern and a peak at the read head, is detected in a neighboring bit cell instead of the proper one.…”
Section: Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Peak shift errors are more characteristic of magnetic recording channels than other channels. Although Seymour [41] states that dropouts-additive errors that change a "1" to a "0"-are the "primary cause of data errors in high-density magnetic recording," other analyses [42] suggest that peak shifts are the most prevalent class of errors for recording channels. A peak shift happens when a "1" in the data, corresponding to a transition in the magnetization pattern and a peak at the read head, is detected in a neighboring bit cell instead of the proper one.…”
Section: Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this point, the codes we have discussed are optimized to work against a certain class of errors-additive, peak shift, or whatever. We know, though, from experi mental data [41,42] that real magnetic channels contain multiple classes of errors.…”
Section: Ytrehus-the Mixed-error Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%