1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0254-0584(97)80061-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of direct methanol fuel cell components by electron microscopy and X-ray microchemical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lattice parameter estimated from XRD data for the Pt-Ru/C catalysts is smaller than for Pt, in agreement with the expected contraction of the lattice due to the partial substitution of Pt by Ru in the fcc structure. 28 The fraction of alloyed Ru in the Pt-Ru/C electrocatalysts was estimated assuming that the variation of lattice parameter on Ru content follows Vegard's law…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lattice parameter estimated from XRD data for the Pt-Ru/C catalysts is smaller than for Pt, in agreement with the expected contraction of the lattice due to the partial substitution of Pt by Ru in the fcc structure. 28 The fraction of alloyed Ru in the Pt-Ru/C electrocatalysts was estimated assuming that the variation of lattice parameter on Ru content follows Vegard's law…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40,41,[46][47][48] Arc melted Pt-Ru alloys show a = 0.3904 nm for Pt-Ru 80:20 and 0.3864 nm for Pt-Ru 50:50, while this last composition has a value of 0.38965 nm when prepared by chemical reduction with sodium borohydride on a carbon support. 47 Radmilovic et al 40 found 0.3898 nm for the 75:25 and 0.3884 nm for the 50:50 PtRu/C alloys.…”
Section: Cell Parameter "A"mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The values of a for materials prepared with the FAM are larger when compared with those of the catalysts obtained by other methods. 40,41,[46][47][48] Arc melted Pt-Ru alloys show a = 0.3904 nm for Pt-Ru 80:20 and 0.3864 nm for Pt-Ru 50:50, while this last composition has a value of 0.38965 nm when prepared by chemical reduction with sodium borohydride on a carbon support.47 Radmilovic et al 40 found 0.3898 nm for the 75:25 and 0.3884 nm for the 50:50 PtRu/C alloys. Thus, this method seems to favor the formation of solid solutions more than the FAM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation has been attributed to the increase of the coverage of Pt-Ru surfaces by oxy-species due to Ru. 3,[33][34][35] However, no crystalline Pt-oxide phase in our catalyst is detected from XRD, possibly indicating that Pt oxides are present mostly at the surface in an amorphous phase. Figure 7 shows the Ru 3p 3/2 peak for the Pt1R1 sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%