Proceedings of 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.1994.411898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of coupling in planar array coils with arbitrary element geometries

Abstract: A method is presented which rapidly characterizes the mutual impedance between elements in array coils for MR imaging as a function of offset distances between elements, These "coupling surfaces" allow the designer to quickly determine the overlap distances which minimize coupling between array elements.The method allows arbitrary element geometries and a layered, planar media. Additionally, because the Green's functions and current distributions are stored in Fourier space, the transverse fleld distributions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two sets of calculated results are included, one set computed using the quasistatic approximations above, and the other using a somewhat more complete full-wave approach which uses the proper Green's function for the lossy medium. 71 All data was computed at 63 MHz, where this is a relatively large coil nearly a tenth of a free space wavelength in total conductor length. The current on the square loops was assumed to be constant in both methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two sets of calculated results are included, one set computed using the quasistatic approximations above, and the other using a somewhat more complete full-wave approach which uses the proper Green's function for the lossy medium. 71 All data was computed at 63 MHz, where this is a relatively large coil nearly a tenth of a free space wavelength in total conductor length. The current on the square loops was assumed to be constant in both methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%