2007
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of constituents in Stellera chamaejasme L. by rapid‐resolution liquid chromatography–diode array detection and electrospray ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry

Abstract: A reliable and rapid method based on rapid-resolution liquid chromatography-diode array detection (RRLC-DAD) and electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF/MS) has been developed for the isolation and characterization of multiple constituents in the root of Stellera chamaejasme L., which was extracted by sonication with methanol in an optimized procedure. Separation of the multiple constituents was achieved on an Agilent Zorbax XDB-C18 (50x3.0 mm i.d.; 1.8 microm) column using a gradient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the intrinsic complexity of the chemical constitutes of S. chamaejasme, hardly any investigations formed an overall recognition for the chemical profiles of this herb but remained in the stage of separation and confirmation for several or a class of compounds. Zhao et al [5] detected 22 isolated chromatography peaks in the total ion current chromatogram (TIC) and nine of them were characterized by RPLC-DAD tandem ESI-Q-TOF-MS. And because of the unavailability of commercial reference standards and the lack of multi-grade fragmentation ability of Q-TOF instrument, diterpenes could not be identified and the reliability of identification results which only based on the accurate molecular weights was doubtable in some degree. Su et al [6] characterized and compared the chemical constitutes of three Chinese herbs "Langdu" (Stellera chamaejasme, Euphorbia fischeriana, and Euphorbia ebracteolata) by LC-MS/MS analysis, but this investigation mainly focused on developing the analytical strategy in the light of respective makers for differentiating these three herbs from the related species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the intrinsic complexity of the chemical constitutes of S. chamaejasme, hardly any investigations formed an overall recognition for the chemical profiles of this herb but remained in the stage of separation and confirmation for several or a class of compounds. Zhao et al [5] detected 22 isolated chromatography peaks in the total ion current chromatogram (TIC) and nine of them were characterized by RPLC-DAD tandem ESI-Q-TOF-MS. And because of the unavailability of commercial reference standards and the lack of multi-grade fragmentation ability of Q-TOF instrument, diterpenes could not be identified and the reliability of identification results which only based on the accurate molecular weights was doubtable in some degree. Su et al [6] characterized and compared the chemical constitutes of three Chinese herbs "Langdu" (Stellera chamaejasme, Euphorbia fischeriana, and Euphorbia ebracteolata) by LC-MS/MS analysis, but this investigation mainly focused on developing the analytical strategy in the light of respective makers for differentiating these three herbs from the related species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) to (e) each contained a deprotonated molecule at m/z 541 in the full scan mass spectra. The root of Stellera chamaejasme , part of the same family as W. indica , has been reported to contain wikstrol A and its isomers chamaejasmine, chamaechromone, neochamaejasmin, and isochamaejasmin . These isomers may be related to the compounds with the same deprotonated species at m/z 541.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 200 L blood samples were collected by scissoring rat tails into heparinized tubes. This was performed at 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1,2,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,14,16,20,24,36,48 and 60 h after administration orally and at 0 (pre-dose), 0.083, 0.17, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 24 and 48 h after i.v. administration via the tail vein.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them were based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) [8], rapid-resolution liquid chromatography-diode array detection (RRLC-DAD) and electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF/MS) [10], high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) [11], highresolution ESMS [11] and NMR spectrometry [11,12] for detection and identification of the constituents. Until now, no method has been reported on pharmacokinetic study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%