2000
DOI: 10.1002/1520-667x(2000)12:8<433::aid-mcs1>3.0.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of chemical selectivity in micellar electrokinetic chromatography: V. The effect of the surfactant hydrophobic chain

Abstract: The influence of the surfactant hydrophobic chain on selectivity in micellar electrokinetic chromatography was investigated using two sets of surfactants. A series of three sarcosinate surfactants (sodium N‐lauroyl sarcosinate, sodium n−myristoyl sarcosinate, and sodium N‐parmitoyl sarcosinate) with C11, C13, and C15 hydrocarbon tails were compared. In addition, sodium dodecyl sulfate and sodium tetradecyl sulfate were investigated to determine the chain length effect for sodium sulfate surfactants. Linear sol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, the b and a coefficients are related to the difference in the hydrogen bond donor and acceptor strengths of the aqueous phase and the vesicles, while s and r describe the dipolarity/polarizability and the potential of the pseudophase to interact with solutes' n or π electrons, respectively. The usefulness of the LSER modeling for characterization of the nature of the underlying solute-micelle interactions [7][8][9][10][11][12] and for octanol-water partitioning has already been demonstrated. 13 A set of 41 uncharged aromatic test solutes was used for the LSER modeling (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, the b and a coefficients are related to the difference in the hydrogen bond donor and acceptor strengths of the aqueous phase and the vesicles, while s and r describe the dipolarity/polarizability and the potential of the pseudophase to interact with solutes' n or π electrons, respectively. The usefulness of the LSER modeling for characterization of the nature of the underlying solute-micelle interactions [7][8][9][10][11][12] and for octanol-water partitioning has already been demonstrated. 13 A set of 41 uncharged aromatic test solutes was used for the LSER modeling (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water molecules that hydrate the vesicle and micelles are the real source of hydrogen bond donating of the pseudophase. Systematic studies of the effect of surfactant structure suggest that the headgroup plays a key role and that the stronger hydration of the aggregates leads to a weaker hydrogen bond donor pseudophase. Micellar pseudophases are stronger H-bond donors, as indicated by the less negative b coefficients for SDS and SDP. This is quite interesting considering the fact that the chemical compositions of DHP and SDP are very similar, as both consist of alkyl chains and a phosphate headgroup.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, when the anionic surfactant changes to sodium lauroyl sarcosine (SLS) which contains a different hydrophilic group −COO - and a comparable hydrophobic chain comparable in molecular structure to that of the SDS molecule, no tubular structure of PANI is obtained in the product, and only micrometer-sized particulates are formed (see Supporting Information, Figure S2). Different from the three above-mentioned surfactants (SDS, SDBS, and AOT) which are demonstrated to be good acidic dopants doping through the electrostatic interaction with polymer chains, , SLS is difficult to use to protonate PANI chains and to dope into the product because of its weak acidity, thereby losing the directing function for constructing PANI rectangular sub-microtubes.
5 SEM images of PANI rectangular sub-microtubes synthesized in the presence of (a) SDBS with the concentration range of 0.57−0.70 mM and (b) AOT with the concentration range of 0.56−0.88 mM.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The list of potential surrogate chromatographic models, identified as just described, together with the source for the original chromatographic data is assembled in Table 3. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] The systems are ranked in descending order by the sum of the system constant differences and the list length restricted to the 10 closest fits for any individual biopartitioning process. To achieve diversity in the selection process (near) duplicate systems were eliminated, for example, all the bile salts have similar system constant ratios and can be substituted for each other without much impact on the ranking.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%