2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.12.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of branched ultrahigh molar mass polymers by asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation and size exclusion chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An anomalous elution has been reported for branched polymer systems 9. Although there is some debate on the nature of the anomalous elution,12 it has been shown that the use of other fractionation techniques, such as FFF, avoided this anomalous elution for highly branched and ultrahigh molar mass polymers 9, 31–35. In some cases, the increase of the molar masses at large elution times is attributed to the anchoring (retention) of branched and crosslinked macromolecules in the pores of the column and hence to a delayed elution together with smaller chains 9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An anomalous elution has been reported for branched polymer systems 9. Although there is some debate on the nature of the anomalous elution,12 it has been shown that the use of other fractionation techniques, such as FFF, avoided this anomalous elution for highly branched and ultrahigh molar mass polymers 9, 31–35. In some cases, the increase of the molar masses at large elution times is attributed to the anchoring (retention) of branched and crosslinked macromolecules in the pores of the column and hence to a delayed elution together with smaller chains 9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the lack of solubility of the polyacrylates (arising from the microgels formed during the polymerization), SEC has only been used to characterize the soluble fraction of the polymers. The whole sample (including the extremely high‐molar‐mass chains present in the gel fraction) could only be analyzed by using a different fractionation method such as field flow fractionation (FFF) 12–14…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that HT-AF4 enables one to separate ultrahigh molar mass samples up to a radius of gyration above 1,000 nm without the disturbing effects typical of SEC, namely the shear-degradation of high molar mass structures and the anomalous late co-elution effects. The problems of erroneous branching calculation and molar mass determination as a result of a curvature in the conformation plot do not exist in AF4 and as a result the molar mass averages calculated from HT-AF4 are significantly higher than those obtained from HT-SEC [201]. In a comparative study, linear HDPE has been analyzed by HT-SEC and HT-AF4.…”
Section: Field Flow Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since no stationary phase is used, shear degradation is largely reduced. For FFF the upper molar mass limit is much higher than for SEC and, therefore, much higher molar mass polymers can be properly analyzed . As no stationary phase is present, filtering of the samples is not required and the soluble and gel containing fractions of the complex samples can be analyzed without problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%