functions, both in the central nervous system and in the periphery, by binding to type-1 and type-2 cannabinoid receptors ( 1 ), and to transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) ion channels ( 2, 3 ). Additional targets of AEA also include 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors ( 4 ), GPR55 or "CB3R" ( 5, 6 ), and the nuclear peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptors ␣ ( 7, 8 ) and ␥ ( 9-11 ).AEA is thought to act as an autocrine/paracrine mediator by activating these receptors either on the cell surface (cannabinoid receptors) or within the cell (TRPV1 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors). Extracellular AEA signaling is terminated through a two-step process consisting of transport inside the cell and subsequent hydrolysis by fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) ( 12 ). The process whereby AEA is transported across the plasma membrane and within the cell is considered a hot topic, because it is a potential target for treatment of several pathologies associated with endocannabinoid system dysfunctions ( 13-21 ).Despite considerable experimental efforts made to clarify the mechanism of AEA transport, there is not yet general consensus on the identity of the elements responsible for this process [see ( 22 ) for a very recent review]. In general, fi ve nonmutually exclusive models have been proposed: i ) passive diffusion ( 23,24 ); ii ) facilitated transport ( 25-27 ); iii ) intracellular traffi cking and sequestration ( 24, 27, 28 ); iv ) endocytosis ( 29, 30 ); and v ) FAAH-mediated uptake ( 31-33 ). These mechanisms might also operAbstract Nonspecifi c binding of anandamide to plastic exhibits many features that could be mistaken as biological processes, thereby representing an important source of confl icting data on the uptake and release of this lipophilic substance. Herein, we propose an improved method to assay anandamide transport, by using glass slides (i.e., coverslips) as physical support to grow cells. Although the results obtained using plastic do not differ signifi cantly from those obtained using glass, the new procedure has the advantage of being faster, simpler, and more accurate. In fact, the lack of aspecifi c adsorption of anandamide to the glass surface yields a lower background and a higher precision and accuracy in determining transport kinetics, especially for the export process. Remarkably, the kinetic parameters of anandamide uptake obtained with the old and the new procedures may be similar or different depending on the cell type, thus demonstrating the complexity of the interference of plastic on the transport process. In addition, the novel procedure is particularly suitable for visualization and measurement of anandamide transport in intact cells by using a biotinylated derivative in confocal fl uorescence microscopy.