2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30503-3_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Bijective Discretized Rotations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When G is dense (see Figure 2(a)), the reasoning of Nouvel and Rémila, originally used to discard 2D digitized irrational rotations as being bijective [13], shows that a corresponding 3D digitized rotation cannot be bijective as well. What differs from the 2D case is the possible existence of non-dense G with a dense factor (see Figure 2(b)).…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When G is dense (see Figure 2(a)), the reasoning of Nouvel and Rémila, originally used to discard 2D digitized irrational rotations as being bijective [13], shows that a corresponding 3D digitized rotation cannot be bijective as well. What differs from the 2D case is the possible existence of non-dense G with a dense factor (see Figure 2(b)).…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contributions known to us were geared toward understanding these alterations in Z 2 : Andres and Jacob provided some necessary conditions under which 2D digitized rotations are bijective [5]; Andres proposed quasi-shear rotations which are bijective but possibly generate errors, particularly for angles around π/2 [1]; Nouvel and Rémila studied the discrete structure induced by digitized rotations that are not bijective but generate no error [12,14]; moreover, they characterized the set of 2D bijective digitized rotations [13]. More recently, Roussillon and Coeurjolly used arithmetic properties of the Gaussian integers to give a different proof of the conditions for bijectivity of 2D digitized rotations [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the discrete spaces (i.e., Z n ), their analogues, namely discrete rotations, are more complex. The induced challenges are not simply due to highdimensionality: indeed, even in Z 2 , discrete rotations raise many difficulties, deriving mainly from their non-necessary bijectivity [1]. In this context, discrete rotations -and the closely related discrete rigid tansformations -have been widely investigated.…”
Section: Discrete Rotations and Discrete Rigid Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pythagorean angles, as seen in [NR04] or [Vos93], are such that α = arctan(a/b) where a and b are issued from a Pythagorean triple (a, b, c) ∈ N 3 (such that a 2 + b 2 = c 2 ). c will be called the radius of the Pythagorean angle.…”
Section: Fundamental Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%