2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2014.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of bigeye tuna habitat in the Southern Waters off Java–Bali using remote sensing data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
16
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the potential habitat was mostly found in the western and southern part of the study area. This spatial distribution result also had the same agreement with results the GAM method [25] and the frontal zone in the study area [4].…”
Section: Relationship Between Environmental Factors and Bigeye Tuna Csupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the potential habitat was mostly found in the western and southern part of the study area. This spatial distribution result also had the same agreement with results the GAM method [25] and the frontal zone in the study area [4].…”
Section: Relationship Between Environmental Factors and Bigeye Tuna Csupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In other words, bigeye tuna prefer to remain in the low SST around the study area. This result displays the same trends as those observed with the GAM analysis in the same study area [21,25]. The optimum value can be inferred by determining the threshold (i.e., average number of bigeye tuna).…”
Section: Relationship Between Environmental Factors and Bigeye Tuna Csupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…() indicated that skipjack in the western North Pacific prefer waters where SSChl is between 0.08 and 0.37 μg/L; our calculations yielded similar concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 0.3 μg/L. The GAMs of Zagagliz, Lorenzzetti, and Stech () and Setiawati, Sambah, Miura, and As‐syakur () that were based upon the longline catch of yellowfin and bigeye indicated a preference for waters where SSChl ranged between 0.05 and 0.17 μg/L. We obtained a preference range of 0.1–0.2 μg/L.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Konsentrasi klorofil-a pada perairan Selat Bali di setiap musim selama tahun 2011-2016 mengalami fluktuasi. Tingginya nilai rata-rata konsentrasi klorofil-a pada musim timur tahun 2011-2016, karena adanya pengaruh dari fenomena upwelling yang terjadidi perairan selatan jawa dan Selat Bali (Ridha et al, 2013;Setiawati et al, 2015). Fenomena upwelling menyebabkan terjadinya penurunan SPL dan tingginya kandungan unsur hara yang kaya akan nutrien (nitrat dan fosfat) menuju ke permukaan perairan, sehingga nutrien dalam jumlah yang tinggi akan diikuti dengan meningkatnya kandungan klorofil-a pada daerah perairan tersebut (Kemili dan Putri, 2012 Pada musim timur tahun 2011-2016 nilai hasil tangkapan ikan tongkol bulan Juni berkisar 0-559.204kg dengan nilai rata-rata sebesar 89.589,6 kg, nilai hasil tangkapan ikan tongkol pada bulan Juli berkisar 0-407.628kg dengan nilai rata-rata sebesar 54.323,7kg, dan nilai hasil tangkapan ikan tongkol pada bulan Agustus berkisar 200-609.984kg dengan nilai rata-rata sebesar 72.475kg.…”
Section:  Dasar Pengambilan Keputusan Pengujianunclassified