[1993] Proceedings of the Twelfth Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference
DOI: 10.1109/sbec.1993.247390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of beef muscle tissue using texture analysis of ultrasonic images

Abstract: In the Unites States, commercially available beef is subjectively graded by certified inspectors. The primary factors in determining beef quality grades are the amount and distribution (or marbling) of intramuscular fat. There is a growing demand in the meat industry for an objective system of evaluating the quality of beef carcasses as well as live animals. Ultrasound has been shown to have a good potential for this application. Our approach was to use texture analysis of the ultrasonic images from rib-eye mu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unreliability of gray level only methods to achieve good discrimination among the different kind of tissues forced us to use more complex measures, usually based on texture analysis. Several researching groups have reported different approximations to characterize the tissue of intravascular ultrasound images [1] [2] [3]. Most of the literature found in the tissue characterization matters use texture features, being co-occurrence matrices the most popular of all feature extractors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unreliability of gray level only methods to achieve good discrimination among the different kind of tissues forced us to use more complex measures, usually based on texture analysis. Several researching groups have reported different approximations to characterize the tissue of intravascular ultrasound images [1] [2] [3]. Most of the literature found in the tissue characterization matters use texture features, being co-occurrence matrices the most popular of all feature extractors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%