Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2001
DOI: 10.1128/aem.67.10.4479-4487.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Bacterial and Fungal Soil Communities by Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis Fingerprints: Biological and Methodological Variability

Abstract: Automated rRNA intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) was used to characterise bacterial (B-ARISA) and fungal (F-ARISA) communities from different soil types. The 16S-23S intergenic spacer region from the bacterial rRNA operon was amplified from total soil community DNA for B-ARISA. Similarly, the two internal transcribed spacers and the 5.8S rRNA gene (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) from the fungal rRNA operon were amplified from total soil community DNA for F-ARISA. Universal fluorescence-labeled primers were used for the PCRs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
268
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 401 publications
(281 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
268
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A preliminary step in the comparison of DNA meta-barcoding and fingerprinting approaches was to post-process the data according to molecular analysis steps specific to each method. For DNA fingerprinting, this was handled by setting a fixed number of OTU bin to be considered during the band profiles analysis (Ranjard et al, 2001(Ranjard et al, , 2013. For the NGS approach, methodological biases (for example, PCRs or sequencing errors), which might generate OTUs of low abundance and equally represented across samples, were removed by bioinformatic filters (Quince et al, 2011) and by two post-processing steps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A preliminary step in the comparison of DNA meta-barcoding and fingerprinting approaches was to post-process the data according to molecular analysis steps specific to each method. For DNA fingerprinting, this was handled by setting a fixed number of OTU bin to be considered during the band profiles analysis (Ranjard et al, 2001(Ranjard et al, , 2013. For the NGS approach, methodological biases (for example, PCRs or sequencing errors), which might generate OTUs of low abundance and equally represented across samples, were removed by bioinformatic filters (Quince et al, 2011) and by two post-processing steps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Model I of this study, we concentrated on analysis of the amplified intergenic spacer of the rRNA gene, as have other researchers [46][47][48][49], because of greater variability in amplified intergenic spacer than 16S rRNA. The relative conservation of the 16S rRNA may not identify all the variation in microbial community structure, such as certain species-level variation [46].…”
Section: Model I Of Amazonian Agricultural System: the "Slash-and-burmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using a PTC 100 thermal cycler (MJ Research Inc., Watertown, MA, USA). The ribosomal intergenic spacer region was amplified using primers 1522F (5 0 -TGCGGCTGGAT CCCCTCCTT-3 0 ) and 132R (5 0 -CCGGGTTTCCCCATT CGG-3 0 ) (Ranjard et al, 2001). The final 50 ml reaction mixture contained: 1 Â PCR buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 4 nmol deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 25 pmol forward and reverse primers, 1.25 units of Taq polymerase (Promega) and B1 ng of template DNA.…”
Section: Identification Of Resistant Bacterial Isolatesmentioning
confidence: 99%