2017
DOI: 10.3390/atmos8040066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Atmospheric Iron Speciation and Acid Processing at Metropolitan Newark on the US East Coast

Abstract: Abstract:To characterize atmospheric dissolved iron over Newark, a large metropolitan city on US east coast, size-segregated (0.056-18 µm in aerodynamic diameter) aerosols were collected in downtown Newark, New Jersey during August to October 2012. Aerosols samples were analyzed for Fe(II) and total dissolved iron (Fe(TD)) by UV/Visible spectroscopy, and water soluble compounds were analyzed by ion chromatograph (IC). Results from this study showed that Fe(II) concentrations were 2.1 ng m −3 (range: 1.2-4.2 ng… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These monodispersed particles were then passed through the headspace of a temperature-controlled Pyrex tube (333–343 K) containing either pure liquid TCP or TBEP to generate coated particles with a calculated coating thickness of approximately 15 nm (calculated based upon the shift in the peak of the particle size distribution). The estimated iron concentration inside the flow tube reactor (∼0.7 μg m –3 ) is comparable to the total mass concentration of iron in ambient aerosols , but is higher than the water-soluble iron concentration in ambient aerosols. , The coated particles were introduced into a mixing vessel after having passed through an activated carbon denuder to remove volatile organics vapors from the flow. Upon the basis of an evaporation model described previously, the evaporation of the OPFRs studied here was estimated to contribute less than 0.3% to the particle-phase loss of OPFRs within the residence time of the mixing vessel and flow tube reactor (see SI).…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These monodispersed particles were then passed through the headspace of a temperature-controlled Pyrex tube (333–343 K) containing either pure liquid TCP or TBEP to generate coated particles with a calculated coating thickness of approximately 15 nm (calculated based upon the shift in the peak of the particle size distribution). The estimated iron concentration inside the flow tube reactor (∼0.7 μg m –3 ) is comparable to the total mass concentration of iron in ambient aerosols , but is higher than the water-soluble iron concentration in ambient aerosols. , The coated particles were introduced into a mixing vessel after having passed through an activated carbon denuder to remove volatile organics vapors from the flow. Upon the basis of an evaporation model described previously, the evaporation of the OPFRs studied here was estimated to contribute less than 0.3% to the particle-phase loss of OPFRs within the residence time of the mixing vessel and flow tube reactor (see SI).…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The estimated iron concentration inside the flow tube reactor (∼0.7 μg m −3 ) is comparable to the total mass concentration of iron in ambient aerosols 33,34 but is higher than the watersoluble iron concentration in ambient aerosols. 35,36 The coated particles were introduced into a mixing vessel after having passed through an activated carbon denuder to remove volatile organics vapors from the flow. Upon the basis of an evaporation model described previously, 42 the evaporation of the OPFRs studied here was estimated to contribute less than 0.3% to the particle-phase loss of OPFRs within the residence time of the mixing vessel and flow tube reactor (see SI).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that absolute atmospheric abundances of oxalic acid and nss-SO 4 2– are not directly responsible for the observed higher Fe ws (%) in the SEA outflow, underscoring the role of another parameter/process. On the basis of the prevailing large difference in the mass concentrations of SO 4 2– and oxalic acid in ambient aerosols, it has been often argued that acid processing might alone control the atmospheric abundances of Fe ws . ,,, However, recent studies have emphasized the role of atmospheric acidity (i.e., represented here by the aerosol pH estimated using the E-AIM II model) in forming SOA (e.g., oxalic acid). ,, Accordingly, we found significant linear relationships of aerosol pH with the molar mass concentrations of oxalic acid and Fe ws in both the continental outflows (IGP and SEA; Figure ). Better correlations were observed here for the SEA outflow samples, suggesting that aerosol acidity over the remote oceans controls both the formation of SOA (e.g., oxalic acid) and Fe ws .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…On the basis of the prevailing large difference in the mass concentrations of SO 4 2− and oxalic acid in ambient aerosols, it has been often argued that acid processing might alone control the atmospheric abundances of Fe ws . 28,50,95,96 However, recent studies have emphasized the role of atmospheric acidity (i.e., represented here by the aerosol pH estimated using the E-AIM II model) in forming SOA (e.g., oxalic acid). 51,71,97−102 Accordingly, we found significant linear relationships of aerosol pH with the molar mass concentrations of oxalic acid and Fe ws in both the continental outflows (IGP and SEA; Figure 3).…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%