2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of asymmetry in microporous membranes by cross-sectional confocal laser scanning microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we describe the use of the new probe for imaging using CLSM. Similar studies on membranes reported in the past use either fluorescently labeled protein [33,34] or a fluorescent dye adsorbed to the matrix [35][36][37] or both [38,39]. To our knowledge this is the first report of in situ analysis and imaging of ligand itself on a separation device.…”
Section: Quantitative Estimation Of Amidine Immobilized On Cellulose supporting
confidence: 56%
“…In this section we describe the use of the new probe for imaging using CLSM. Similar studies on membranes reported in the past use either fluorescently labeled protein [33,34] or a fluorescent dye adsorbed to the matrix [35][36][37] or both [38,39]. To our knowledge this is the first report of in situ analysis and imaging of ligand itself on a separation device.…”
Section: Quantitative Estimation Of Amidine Immobilized On Cellulose supporting
confidence: 56%
“…However, one of the drawbacks of CLSM is the short penetration depth. Marroquin et al [43] developed a methodology to overcome this limitation by sectioning the membrane samples parallel to the z-axis, to give flat cross-section layers that could be analyzed with CLSM. This method has been used to obtain information on fouling caused by a protein (casein) and a polysaccharide (dextran) filtered with a MF polyethersulfone (PES) membrane [44].…”
Section: Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fundamental understanding of the influence of the dispersion process and the ability for characterization and comparison (e.g., by Figure 3. Coupling scheme of single particle/swarm mechanisms and particle sizes/shapes (according to [157]). mass or heat transfer coefficient, energy dissipation rate) needs to be combined with a quantification of the impact of physical property variation on the size distributions (e.g., due to impurities, changes in quality, progressing reaction).…”
Section: Particle Size Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%