2017
DOI: 10.18178/ijesd.2017.8.1.919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of an Atmospheric Air Non-thermal Plasma Device in Relation to Ozone Production

Abstract: Abstract-An atmospheric air non-thermal plasma (NTP) device is characterized in relation to ozone production. The electron density, n e , electron temperature, T e and ozone concentration are measured for three dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) geometries, i.e., ten tubes of 10 mm outer diameter (OD), six tubes of 25 mm OD, and three tubes of 40 mm OD.n e and T e are deduced using optical emission spectroscopy via the line ratio method and the ozone concentrations are measured by using an ozone meter.n e and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results have been reported by Peters et al [21], where the surface free energy increased after plasma treatments of 30-90 s, at electron energies of 9.8-12.6 eV (electron temperatures of 76-106.7×10 3 K). In this study, the electron energy is much lower at 6.6 eV (50.6×10 3 K), however the treatment time is significantly longer at 0.5 and 1 h (the procedures for determining the electron energy and temperature are reported elsewhere [22]). Figure 3 shows the SEM images of the pulverized EFB samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Similar results have been reported by Peters et al [21], where the surface free energy increased after plasma treatments of 30-90 s, at electron energies of 9.8-12.6 eV (electron temperatures of 76-106.7×10 3 K). In this study, the electron energy is much lower at 6.6 eV (50.6×10 3 K), however the treatment time is significantly longer at 0.5 and 1 h (the procedures for determining the electron energy and temperature are reported elsewhere [22]). Figure 3 shows the SEM images of the pulverized EFB samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%