2020
DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-0150-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of adverse reactions to benznidazole in patients with Chagas disease in the Federal District, Brazil

Abstract: Introduction: Benznidazole is used for treating Chagas disease (CD). This cross-sectional study aimed to characterize the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of benznidazole at a public hospital in Brazil's Federal District. Methods: Medical records were analyzed and ADRs were categorized by type, intensity, seriousness, and causality. Results: Of the 62 patients who started benznidazole treatment for CD, 41 (66%) presented with 105 ADRs; 23 (37%) discontinued the treatment. Most reactions were classified as probabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most frequent benznidazole-related adverse effects were mild and moderate/severe dermatological reactions (~14%-22%), and the second most frequent were neurologic disorders (10%). Compared with previous retrospective studies 16 , 21 - 24 , our patients had fewer gastrointestinal disorders (only 5% versus 20%-30%). A limitation of our study was the exclusion of patients who did not return for follow-up, which might introduce bias, as patients with more severe adverse effects may have decided not to return to the clinic, although this might also mean that they simply had not taken the medication.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…The most frequent benznidazole-related adverse effects were mild and moderate/severe dermatological reactions (~14%-22%), and the second most frequent were neurologic disorders (10%). Compared with previous retrospective studies 16 , 21 - 24 , our patients had fewer gastrointestinal disorders (only 5% versus 20%-30%). A limitation of our study was the exclusion of patients who did not return for follow-up, which might introduce bias, as patients with more severe adverse effects may have decided not to return to the clinic, although this might also mean that they simply had not taken the medication.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%