2001
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of additional genetic events in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with TEL/AML1 gene fusion: a molecular cytogenetics study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(29 reference statements)
4
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14 To the best of our knowledge, only eight ETV6/RUNX1-positive ALLs with partial Xq gains, as identified by metaphase CGH or multicolor FISH, have been described. [15][16][17][27][28][29] All the gains in these cases were generated through unbalanced translocations involving Xq, none of which were seen by conventional cytogenetics. Notably, all cases with Xq gain in the present study were males, as were six of the previously published cases; 16,17,[27][28][29] the gender of the remaining two cases was not reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…14 To the best of our knowledge, only eight ETV6/RUNX1-positive ALLs with partial Xq gains, as identified by metaphase CGH or multicolor FISH, have been described. [15][16][17][27][28][29] All the gains in these cases were generated through unbalanced translocations involving Xq, none of which were seen by conventional cytogenetics. Notably, all cases with Xq gain in the present study were males, as were six of the previously published cases; 16,17,[27][28][29] the gender of the remaining two cases was not reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Some of these events could be reflected on the chromosomal level as nonrandom secondary abnormalities and comprise, in particular, the deletion of the nonrearranged TEL allele, the duplications of the normal chromosome 21 and the der(21)t(12;21) as well as more unspecific ones such as 6q deletions and 9p abnormalities. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Since the t(12;21) is virtually undetectable with conventional cytogenetic procedures, the two preferred screening methods are those with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). 1-6, 9-13,17,21-33 The latter technology has the advantage that it enables the identification and quantification of the most common and, thus, most relevant secondary changes on a single cell level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 It has also been shown that the coiled-coil region of ETO could oligomerize with AML1-ETO protein, thus recruiting the nuclear corepressor N-CoR responsible for transcriptional repression of AML1 target genes and resulting in impaired differentiation of primary hematopoietic precursors. 17,18 Recently, we and others have reported other mechanisms of inactivation of AML1 in hematological malignancies, through point mutations of the gene in AML and in MDS [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] or through gene amplification, [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] a rare event mainly observed in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In this review, we focused on those two other mechanisms of AML1 deregulation in hematological malignancies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%