1998
DOI: 10.1080/010503998419696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Acoustic Reflex Latency in Normal-Hearing Subjects

Abstract: Acoustic reflex latency (ARL) has been suggested as an indicator in otoneurological diagnosis. However, limited normative data are available. Conflicting evidence exists regarding the effect of stimulus parameters such as frequency on ARL. In addition, there has been little research investigating the effects of ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation on ARL. In view of these problems, ARL was measured in 30 normal-hearing subjects using 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz tones, low-pass noise, high-pass noise, broadba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in line with the previous study findings (Narayanan, 2017;Prabhu et al, 2015). However, the ARL values have also been reported to be longer at high frequencies (Clemis and Sarno, 1980;Qiu and Stacker, 1998). The methodological differences between the studies might have contributed to this discrepancy and further large-scale research is essential to verify this issue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is in line with the previous study findings (Narayanan, 2017;Prabhu et al, 2015). However, the ARL values have also been reported to be longer at high frequencies (Clemis and Sarno, 1980;Qiu and Stacker, 1998). The methodological differences between the studies might have contributed to this discrepancy and further large-scale research is essential to verify this issue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In line with the outcomes of previous studies, an insignificant ear effect was also noted when the ARL results were compared between left and right ears (Narayanan, 2017;Qiu and Stacker, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Table 1 summarizes the signal level used to record the CAP for each participant. Finally, the possible effect of the acoustic reflexes was reduced because the CAP transient stimuli were much shorter than the clinical acoustic reflexes latency (,100 msec) (Qiu and Stucker, 1997). Also, the maximum signal level of contralateral tones used in this study was 70 dB HL, which is lower than the measured acoustic reflex threshold for all participants.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Dallos (1964) reported latencies between 40 and 160 ms for narrowband elicitors monitored using probe tones from 250 to 1500 Hz. Qiu and Stucker (1998) reported mean latencies for various elicitors ranging from 118 ms (SD = 30 ms) for low frequency band noise to the longest at 157 ms (SD = 25 ms) for clicks presented at 50 Hz. However, Neergaard and Rasmussen (1966) reported a median latency of 17 ms when the MEMR magnitude was measured using electromyography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%