2010
DOI: 10.1118/1.3392198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a unit at a secondary standard dosimetry laboratory: Monte Carlo simulations compared to measurements and results from the literature

Abstract: The reduction in the value of K(air)/D(w) following source exchange was explained by the spectral differences between the two sources that were larger in the free in-air geometry used for K(air) calibrations than at 5 g/cm2 depth in the water phantom used for D(w) calibrations. Literature review revealed differences between published in-air 60Co spectra derived for sources of different active diameters, and investigators in need of an accurately determined 60Co in-air spectrum should be aware of differences du… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The source is a point source collimated into a 10 × 10 cm 2 field size at the surface of the phantom with the Source Surface Distance (SSD) of 100 cm. For validation purposes, the calculation for Exradin A1SL in reference condition was repeated using the phase space files of the 60 Co radiation unit used by the secondary standard dosimetry laboratory at The Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM) in Stockholm …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The source is a point source collimated into a 10 × 10 cm 2 field size at the surface of the phantom with the Source Surface Distance (SSD) of 100 cm. For validation purposes, the calculation for Exradin A1SL in reference condition was repeated using the phase space files of the 60 Co radiation unit used by the secondary standard dosimetry laboratory at The Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM) in Stockholm …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For validation purposes, the calculation for Exradin A1SL in reference condition was repeated using the phase space files of the 60 Co radiation unit used by the secondary standard dosimetry laboratory at The Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM) in Stockholm. 14 For the calculations with the msr field, the previously generated LGK Perfexion TM phase space file 1 for msr field (16 mm size) is used as an input radiation source in this study. The half-sphere water phantom designed by Drzymala et al, 15 the solid water LGK Dosimetry Phantom 16 and the Elekta acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) phantom used frequently in the calibration of LGK Perfexion TM model were simulated in EGSnrc and PENELOPE Monte Carlo codes.…”
Section: A Simulation Setup and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Fig ure 1 pres ents ex per i men tal set-up for the lat eral beam pro files and geo met ric struc ture of the ir ra di a tion sys tem [15]. Mea sure ments at one po si tion were con ducted 10 times per min ute.…”
Section: Gamma-ray Ir Ra DI a Tion Con Di Tionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiation field analyzer is used for the measurement of the depth-dose data and dose profiles for the purpose of input data in treatment planning system. Several authors have performed the simulation of various telecobalt units for the study of dosimetry parameters [5]- [12]. Mora et al studied the relative air kerma, influence of collimation system on the photon spectra, and the effect of electron contamination in output in Eldorado telecobalt unit using BEAMnrc code [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…performed the simulation of 60 Co unit at secondary standard dosimetry laboratory for comparison of results with the measurement data [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%