Molecular modeling has been used to predict that 2,6-disubstituted amidoanthraquinones, and not the 1,4 series, should preferentially interact with and stabilize triplestranded DNA structures over duplex DNA. This is due to marked differences in the nature of chromophore-base stacking and groove accessibility for the two series. A DNA footprinting method that monitors the extent of protection from DNase I cleavage on triplex formation has been used to examine the effects of a number of synthetic isomer compounds in the 1,4 and 2,6 series. The experimental results are in accord with the predicted behavior and confirm that the 1,4 series bind preferentially to double-rather than triplestranded DNA, whereas the isomeric 2,6 derivatives markedly favor binding to triplex DNA.The DNA double helix can, subject to several sequence restrictions, interact with a third strand of oligonucleotide or polynucleotide to form a triple-stranded helix, the DNA triplex (1-4). There are two principal categories of triplex that are defined by these sequence restrictions. In one, a third pyrimidine-rich strand interacts by means of Hoogsteen hydrogen bonds with a stretch of purines in the target duplex and is oriented parallel to it. This involves T-AT and C+*GC triplet base interactions, with a requirement for a low pH in the latter instance due to necessary protonation of the third-strand cytosine to enable the formation of two hydrogen bonds to a guanine base. The second category has a third purine-rich strand, now oriented anti-parallel to a purine stretch in the duplex target, involving A-TA and GCG base interactions. These intermolecular triplexes have aroused considerable interest as potential inhibitors of the expression of particular genes, since a sequence of either third-strand pyrimidines or purines, when -16-18 base pairs long, can be sufficient to be unique for recognition and binding to defined single sites in a genome. A number of experiments have now been reported that demonstrate the feasibility of this concept. Specific inhibition of transcription has been shown by means of triplex formation at poly(purine/pyrimidine) sites in promoter sequences [for example, in the promoter of the a subunit of the interleukin 2 receptor to the NF-KB transcription factor (5, 6), in the c-myc promoter (7-9), and to a Spl transcriptional activator site in the Ha-ras gene (10)]. Triplex formation can also directly inhibit transcription by blocking RNA polymerase (11, 12).Association of a third strand with a duplex is a thermodynamically weaker and a kinetically slower interaction (13-16) than duplex formation itself. Covalent attachment of intercalating groups such as acridines or ellipticines, mostly to the 5' end of the third strand, has been used to provide enhanced triplex stability, with the chromophore probably being intercalated within a duplex site close to the duplex-triplex junction (3,5,17). Functionalization with a photoreactive psoralen has a similar effect, although in this instance UV activation leads to covalent...