“…To investigate which of the two alternatives was the case, we searched for putative native transaminases in P. putida KT2440 (taxid: 160488) by using BLASTp analysis (Dalal and Atri, 2014) with two ATAs as query sequences; Cv‐ATA from Chromobacterium violaceum (Kaulmann et al ., 2007; Du et al ., 2014) and Pp‐SpuC from P. putida (taxid: 303; Galman et al ., 2017; Galman et al ., 2018). Cv‐ATA (PDB id: http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=4BA5) was used as a query sequence since it has previously been found to catalyse the desired reaction (Kaulmann et al ., 2007), and the putrescine transaminase Pp‐SpuC (PDB id: http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=6HX9) was chosen because it has been shown to recognize a broad spectrum of aromatic compounds as substrate (Galman et al ., 2017; Galman et al ., 2018). The top three ATAs displaying the lowest e‐value and highest sequence homology to both Pp‐SpuC and Cv‐ATA were chosen for further investigations and denoted here as Pp‐SpuC‐I (gene PP_2180), Pp‐SpuC‐II (gene PP_5182) and Pp‐ATA (gene PP_2588), respectively (Table S1).…”