2014
DOI: 10.1111/nan.12065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a population of neural progenitor cells in the infant hippocampus

Abstract: AimsAbnormalities of the hippocampus are associated with a range of diseases in children, including epilepsy and sudden death. A population of rod cells in part of the hippocampus, the polymorphic layer of the dentate gyrus, has long been recognized in infants. Previous work suggested that these cells were microglia and that their presence was associated with chronic illness and sudden infant death syndrome. Prompted by the observations that a sensitive immunohistochemical marker of microglia used in diagnosti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We confirmed MCM2-positive cells in both patient groups which were morphologically similar to DCX-positive cells in the dentate gyrus. Similar DCX-positive cells have been recently described in the infant dentate gyrus (Paine et al 2013) but such immature-appearing DCX-positive cells have not previously been reported in the adult human hippocampus or in HS (D'Alessio et al 2010). There were, however, no group differences in the numbers of DCX or MCM2 cells to suggest altered dentate maturation or neurogenesis in HS-P relative to HS-NP patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…We confirmed MCM2-positive cells in both patient groups which were morphologically similar to DCX-positive cells in the dentate gyrus. Similar DCX-positive cells have been recently described in the infant dentate gyrus (Paine et al 2013) but such immature-appearing DCX-positive cells have not previously been reported in the adult human hippocampus or in HS (D'Alessio et al 2010). There were, however, no group differences in the numbers of DCX or MCM2 cells to suggest altered dentate maturation or neurogenesis in HS-P relative to HS-NP patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…DCX + stellate cells have been reported in the vicinity of acute infarcts with co-expression of astroglial lineage markers (GFAP, S100) rather than microglial or mature neuronal markers as NeuN [ 25 ]. In another study however, DCX + ‘rod’ cells in the infant hippocampal subgranular zone region, that morphologically resembled microglia, lacked CD68 and HLADR expression and were argued to represent neural progenitor cell types [ 34 ]. In adult mammals, DCX + cells are reported to be enriched in the subgranular zone of the hippocampus, and are described as ‘ramified’, although exhibiting more overt neuronal morphology with apical dendrites [ 14 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We trialed four DCX commercially-available antibodies on selected surgical and PM cases. All four antibodies were previously validated in publications on human tissues [ 9 , 28 , 34 , 40 , 46 ] (Table 2 ; DCX Ab1 to 4). All DCX antibodies showed immunopositive labelling, but DCX Ab1 (clone 4604, Cell signaling, Boston, USA) labelled a greater diversity of cell types, and more intense labelling was observed in both surgical and PM human brain tissues.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, the study of microglia in the CNS of the human infant (1–12months) has been limited to a few regions, including the hippocampus ( Del Bigio and Becker, 1994 ; Kinney et al., 2015 ; Paine et al., 2014 ), caudate nucleus and medulla ( Esiri et al., 1991 ), cerebellum ( Maslinska et al., 1998 ), parietal cortex ( Billiards et al., 2006 ), other regions of the neocortex ( Kjær et al., 2016 ), and subcortical white matter and key white matter tracts ( Sigaard et al., 2014 ). While these studies identified unique microglial populations in discrete brain regions, they did not compare microglial populations, microglial morphology or activation state in multiple brain regions in the same subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%