2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.net.2015.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a Neutron Beam Following Reconfiguration of the Neutron Radiography Reactor (NRAD) Core and Addition of New Fuel Elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two complete neutron beam characterizations have been performed at NRAD in the past 30 years, once in 1992 [7] and again in 2013 [8]. Additional fuel elements were added to the NRAD reactor core in 2013, after which the ERS neutron beam was characterized to understand the impact of the new fuel on the beam performance [9]. Each characterization was performed after properties in the reactor core were altered resulting in changes to the neutron beam characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two complete neutron beam characterizations have been performed at NRAD in the past 30 years, once in 1992 [7] and again in 2013 [8]. Additional fuel elements were added to the NRAD reactor core in 2013, after which the ERS neutron beam was characterized to understand the impact of the new fuel on the beam performance [9]. Each characterization was performed after properties in the reactor core were altered resulting in changes to the neutron beam characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neutron beam flux was measured using foil activation methods [7]. An array of 21 gold foils was activated in the TREAT neutron beam for 3 hours with the reactor power of 80 kW.…”
Section: Beam Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An array of 21 gold foils was activated in the TREAT neutron beam for 3 hours with the reactor power of 80 kW. The resulting activity was measured using a calibrated high-purity germanium detector, then the activity at the end of exposure in the neutron beam was calculated based on this measurement, the decay constant, and the time between the measurement and end of exposure [7][8]. The measured average thermal equivalent neutron flux at the image plane is 8.25×10 6 ± 1.89×10 5 n/cm 2 s with the reactor power at 80 kW.…”
Section: Beam Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several exposures were taken with film and nCR for evaluation, see Figure 5. Images of the sensitivity indicator exhibit a Category-I facility according to ASTM E-545 [3,4] D3-SC Film RTP Image, Thermal Neutron Energy, from Dysprosium Transfer Foil nCR Blue Plate RTP Image, Thermal Neutron Energy, from Dysprosium Transfer Foil Figure 5 Resolution Test Piece It is important to note that the transfer method of irradiated nuclear fuels requires shielding and confinement. These factors determine the maximum resolution possible for the given system due to geometric unsharpness.…”
Section: Neutron Computed Radiography Of Irradiated Fuelmentioning
confidence: 99%