2018
DOI: 10.3390/met8070475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of 17-4PH Single Tracks Produced at Different Parametric Conditions towards Increased Productivity of LPBF Systems—The Effect of Laser Power and Spot Size Upscaling

Abstract: Global industrial adoption of laser-based powder bed fusion (LPBF) technology is still limited by the production speed, the size of the build envelope, and therefore the maximum part size that can be produced. The cost of LPBF can be driven down further by improving the build rates without compromising structural integrity. A common approach is that the build rate can be improved by increasing the laser power and beam diameter to instantly melt a large area of powder, thus reducing the scanning time for each l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to studying the full LPBF process to realize parts and samples for tensile and fatigue tests, single-track experiments are extensively used to understand the powder-laser interaction [48][49][50][51]. These experiments allow highlighting the presence of stability zones, where the track is continuous, and instability zones, whose irregularities (i.e., distortions, balling) are highly dependent on the scanning speed values, on the laser power, on the thickness of the powder layer and the substrate material on which it is spread, and on the powder particle morphology and granulometry [33,42,46,48,[52][53][54].…”
Section: The Lpbf Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to studying the full LPBF process to realize parts and samples for tensile and fatigue tests, single-track experiments are extensively used to understand the powder-laser interaction [48][49][50][51]. These experiments allow highlighting the presence of stability zones, where the track is continuous, and instability zones, whose irregularities (i.e., distortions, balling) are highly dependent on the scanning speed values, on the laser power, on the thickness of the powder layer and the substrate material on which it is spread, and on the powder particle morphology and granulometry [33,42,46,48,[52][53][54].…”
Section: The Lpbf Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection between the shape of the laser beam profile and the melt pool was extensively studied in the literature [51,91,92]. Furthermore, the top-hat shape employed in laser welding [93] was shown to produce keyholes having a shorter depth and, for this reason, Tenbrock et al [94] recently applied this profile in laser powder bed fusion of 316 L stainless steel, showing that an efficient LPBF processes can also be realized by applying diode lasers as long as a proper defined intensity threshold is exceeded (I ≈ 8-10 × 10 5 W/cm 2 [94]).…”
Section: Heat Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allowed for the application of a wide processing window, with E V in the range between 60 and 240 J mm −3 for the investigated alloying system. A higher energy input resulted in higher homogeneity of the elemental distribution due to enlargement of the melt pool size by means of width and depth, which resulted in a higher number of powder particles in the melt pool [36]. The calculated particle amount contained in the melt pools shown in Figure 5 was 15 for Figure 5b, 57 for Figure 5d, and 386 for Figure 5f.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 6a, partially molten particles and heterogeneously composed areas can be found. Furthermore, the increased energy input also promoted higher homogeneity due to a higher melt pool temperature [36]. As a consequence, less nonfused material was observed (Figure 5 and Figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beam quality, power density, and intensity profile all influence LPBF processing quality. Yadroitsev et al, Makoana et al, and Shi et al showed that in LPBF, the width of the tracks is primarily defined by spot size and laser power [7][8][9]. During laser processing, the diameter of the laser beam defines the power density and, as a result, geometrical characteristics of single tracks.…”
Section: Laser Beam Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%