The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and quantification of groundwater sulfate sources at a mining site in an arid climate: The Monument Valley site in Arizona, USA

Abstract: The Monument Valley site, a former uranium mining site located in the state of Arizona in the Southwest USA, has high concentrations of sulfate in groundwater. Stable isotope analysis of S and O for sulfate, in combination with geochemical and hydrogeological data, was used to characterize the sources and fate of sulfate. The results indicate the existence of two discrete sources of sulfate (in excess of baseline levels): sulfuric acid released during ore processing and sulfate generated via sulfide-mineral ox… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The δ 34 S of sulfate in the groundwater contaminant plume is different from background due to the impact of sulfate generated from sulfuric acid and associated sulfate salts from mill operation, and reflects the proportional mixing of the two primary sources. The δ 34 S of sulfate for the sulfuric-acid source was determined to be +24.3‰ (Miao et al, 2013b). The value obtained for the baseline δ 34 S of sulfate in the test area of the plume (+16.1‰) prior to the test is consistent with the relative contributions of the two sources (74% from sulfuric acid and 26% from background).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The δ 34 S of sulfate in the groundwater contaminant plume is different from background due to the impact of sulfate generated from sulfuric acid and associated sulfate salts from mill operation, and reflects the proportional mixing of the two primary sources. The δ 34 S of sulfate for the sulfuric-acid source was determined to be +24.3‰ (Miao et al, 2013b). The value obtained for the baseline δ 34 S of sulfate in the test area of the plume (+16.1‰) prior to the test is consistent with the relative contributions of the two sources (74% from sulfuric acid and 26% from background).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stable isotope analysis of S and O for sulfate, in combination with geochemical and hydrogeological data, was used recently to characterize the sources and background conditions for sulfate in groundwater at this site (Miao et al, 2013b). Regional baseline concentrations of sulfate in groundwater are low (~20–30 mg/L).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our irrigated plantings did not remove sulfate in the subpile soil, probably because redox conditions in the vadose zone did not favor sulfate reduction (Miao et al , ). However, the plantings did isolate sulfate in the subpile soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goals of our research at Monument Valley were, first, to find ways to prevent further migration of contaminants from the subpile soil into groundwater; second, to prevent further spread of the groundwater plume; and third, to remove the contaminants. Previous studies characterized the movement of contaminants in the Monument Valley plume and evaluated options for remediation (Jordan et al , ; Carroll et al , ; Borden et al , ; Miao et al , , ). This study evaluated in situ bioremediation options (native plants and microbial processes) to isolate and remediate ammonium, nitrate, and sulfate remaining in the subpile soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%