2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1488679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and optimization of scan speed for tapping-mode atomic force microscopy

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inReal time reduction of probe-loss using switching gain controller for high speed atomic force microscopy Rev. Sci. Instrum.Increasing the imaging speed of tapping mode atomic force microscopy ͑AFM͒ has important practical and scientific applications. The scan speed of tapping-mode AFMs is limited by the speed of the feedback loop that maintains a constant tapping amplitude. This article seeks to illuminate these limits to scanning speed. The limits to the feedback loop are: ͑1͒… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
109
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods to actively control Q have previously been proposed 10,17 , although generally to increase, rather than decrease Q. These methods could be used to decrease the Q by a small amount 17,18 , which could provide a modest additional increase in the detection bandwidth in parallel with our approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Methods to actively control Q have previously been proposed 10,17 , although generally to increase, rather than decrease Q. These methods could be used to decrease the Q by a small amount 17,18 , which could provide a modest additional increase in the detection bandwidth in parallel with our approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Due to nonlinear interactions with the surface, the tip oscillation amplitude responds almost instantaneously to a step up in the surface (see the left side of Figure 23). However, when there is a step down in the surface height, the response time of the cantilever oscillation will be proportional to Q/ω o , where ω o is its resonant frequency (see the right side of Figure 23) [98]. The flywheel action (the Wile E. Coyote effect), also introduces a limitation on the imaging speed without imaging artifacts.…”
Section: Tip/ Cantilevermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this report we show that excellent damping can be accomplished by a novel method of active vibration control of the z-actuators. Because the quality factor (Q) of the z-actuators' resonance is markedly reduced by this method, the response speed is greatly 5 enhanced. Although the phase delay is pronounced with this active damping, it can be compensated by means of an inverse transform function method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the low 3 resonant frequency of conventional sample-stage scanners, Sulcheck et al used a cantilever with an integrated zinc oxide piezo actuator capable of deflecting itself to keep the tip-sample interaction force constant. [3][4][5] They achieved a feedback bandwidth (i.e., imaging bandwidth) of 38 kHz and a frame rate of ~4/sec. 3 However, the self-actuating cantilever inevitably becomes very stiff, and hence is inappropriate for the imaging of soft samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%