2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-4123-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and modeling of the temperature-dependent thermal conductivity in sintered porous silicon-aluminum nanomaterials

Abstract: Nanostructured silicon and silicon-aluminum compounds are synthesized by a novel synthesis strategy based on spark plasma sintering (SPS) of silicon nanopowder, mesoporous silicon (pSi), and aluminum nanopowder. The interplay of metal-assisted crystallization and inherent porosity is exploited to largely suppress thermal conductivity. Morphology and temperature-dependent thermal conductivity studies allow us to elucidate the impact of porosity and nanostructure on the macroscopic heat transport. Analytic elect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of these results, we assume that the phonon mean free path in the CuP 2– y film is low due to disorder and/or phonon boundary scattering . The latter is likely enhanced by the small grains, low thickness, and porous morphology of the film. The electronic contribution to the thermal conductivity is negligible due to the low hole concentration of CuP 2– y (Figure ). The thermal conductivities of Cu 3– z P and Cu 1.61 P are only slightly higher and their temperature dependences are similar to the case of CuP 2– y .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…On the basis of these results, we assume that the phonon mean free path in the CuP 2– y film is low due to disorder and/or phonon boundary scattering . The latter is likely enhanced by the small grains, low thickness, and porous morphology of the film. The electronic contribution to the thermal conductivity is negligible due to the low hole concentration of CuP 2– y (Figure ). The thermal conductivities of Cu 3– z P and Cu 1.61 P are only slightly higher and their temperature dependences are similar to the case of CuP 2– y .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…41 The latter is likely enhanced by the small grains, low thickness, and porous morphology of the film. [40][41][42] The electronic contribution to the thermal conductivity is negligible due to the low hole concentration of CuP 2−y (Fig. 8).…”
Section: F Thermoelectric Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%