1996
DOI: 10.1016/s1246-7820(96)80061-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and functional activity of human Rh monoclonal antibodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 14 out of the 15 positions corresponding to these residues, the macaque The low reactivity of RF with the human IgG 1 anti-D MoAb we used here is certainly not explained by an insufficient coating of RBCs. First, the anti-D was used at saturating concentrations and the density of its antigenic target (the human RhD antigen) was identical (40 000 sites per RBC [37]) to that of the target of the macaque monoclonal Cyn2-4D5, which is specific for the Rh17 epitope of the RhCcEe-related polypeptide [38]. Second, the density of the coating obtained with the human IgG 1 anti-D was twice that obtained with the macaque Cyn2-4D5 MoAb, as confirmed by flow cytometry (see Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 14 out of the 15 positions corresponding to these residues, the macaque The low reactivity of RF with the human IgG 1 anti-D MoAb we used here is certainly not explained by an insufficient coating of RBCs. First, the anti-D was used at saturating concentrations and the density of its antigenic target (the human RhD antigen) was identical (40 000 sites per RBC [37]) to that of the target of the macaque monoclonal Cyn2-4D5, which is specific for the Rh17 epitope of the RhCcEe-related polypeptide [38]. Second, the density of the coating obtained with the human IgG 1 anti-D was twice that obtained with the macaque Cyn2-4D5 MoAb, as confirmed by flow cytometry (see Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IgG monoclonal anti-D antibodies, with known serological specificity, have been evaluated in various in vitro systems to test how effective the mAbs are at interacting with immune system effector cells. The variation of monoclonal anti-D in these functional tests has also been studied in the international monoclonal workshops [19,27,28]. Each assay tests efficacy at binding to different Fc receptors.…”
Section: Functional Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%