2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and evaluate the efficiency of different filter media in removing nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Filter media permeability experiments were performed varying the flow rate from 100 to 1000 mL/min and the pressure drop was measured using a digital manometer (VelociCalc Model 3A-181WP09, TSI) connected to filtration apparatus as shown in Figure 1, and as described in reference [51].…”
Section: Structural and Morphological Properties Of Nanofiber Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filter media permeability experiments were performed varying the flow rate from 100 to 1000 mL/min and the pressure drop was measured using a digital manometer (VelociCalc Model 3A-181WP09, TSI) connected to filtration apparatus as shown in Figure 1, and as described in reference [51].…”
Section: Structural and Morphological Properties Of Nanofiber Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, filter characterization was evaluated such as thickness, grammage, fiber diameter using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. It was analyzed the images to obtain the fiber diameter of the filters using Image Pro-Plus v. 7 Program and the same procedure as in Bortolassi et al [24]. Then, nanoparticles in the size range between 7.4 and 300 nm were generated using particles generator and an aqueous slurry of 0.1 g/L nickel oxide.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental unit included an air compressor (Shultz, Acworth, GA, USA), air purification filters (Model A917A-8104N-000 and 0A0-000), an atomizer aerosol generator (Model 3079, TSI, Shoreview, MN, USA), a diffusion dryer (Norgren IMI, Birmingham, UK), a Kriptônio and Americium neutralizing source (Model 3054, TSI, Shoreview, MN, USA), a filter apparatus, a flowmeter tube size 3 (Gilmont, Vernon Hills, IL, USA), and a scanning mobility particle sizer that comprises an electrostatic classifier (Model 3080, TSI, Shoreview, MN, USA), a differential mobility analyzer, and an ultrafine particle counter (Model 3776, TSI, Shoreview, MN, USA), as described by Bortolassi et al [46].…”
Section: Testing the Nanofiber Filter's Filtration Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nanofiber diameter distribution was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with a Hitachi S4800 microscope (Tokyo, Japan), and thickness was measured with a caliper (Starrett, Athol, MA, USA). The fiber diameter was measured from SEM images using Image J1.29X as described by Bortolassi et al [46]. The fiber size distribution was determined by measuring 100 fibers of each filter medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation