1991
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4894(91)90135-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and detection of a newly described Asian taeniid using cloned ribosomal DNA fragments and sequence amplification by the polymerase chain reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the complete sequence differences we report here among cox1, cob and nad4 genes of T. asiatica and T. saginata are consistent with the conclusion that T. asiatica is a sister species (Zarlenga et al 1991 ;Zarlenga & George, 1995 ;Galan-Puchades and Mas-Coma, 1996 ;Alkire et al 1998 ;Galan-Puchades and Fuentes, 2000 ;Hoberg et al 2000 ;Schantz, 2000 ;Eom et al 2002 ;Ito et al 2003). This information will add to the knowledge of mitochondrial genomics of parasitic cestodes, provides a resource for the comparative mitochondrial genome analyses of cestodes, and may yield genetic markers for molecular epidemiological investigations into taeniid parasites.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, the complete sequence differences we report here among cox1, cob and nad4 genes of T. asiatica and T. saginata are consistent with the conclusion that T. asiatica is a sister species (Zarlenga et al 1991 ;Zarlenga & George, 1995 ;Galan-Puchades and Mas-Coma, 1996 ;Alkire et al 1998 ;Galan-Puchades and Fuentes, 2000 ;Hoberg et al 2000 ;Schantz, 2000 ;Eom et al 2002 ;Ito et al 2003). This information will add to the knowledge of mitochondrial genomics of parasitic cestodes, provides a resource for the comparative mitochondrial genome analyses of cestodes, and may yield genetic markers for molecular epidemiological investigations into taeniid parasites.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…They concluded that variation in morphology and lack of strongly distinct partitions in genetic sequence data precluded recognition of a species. Interestingly, although it was clear that these taxa could be separated based on an array of morphological and molecular data [22,23,54] and strong evidence for sympatry of T. saginata, T. asiatica and T. solium across Asia was apparent, the former were relegated to subspecies status [24,25].…”
Section: Taenia Asiatica a Valid Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fan and his colleagues including Soh from Korea and Kosin from Indonesia expected it to be an undescribed species (Kosin et al, 1972;Soh et al, 1988;Fan et al, 1990). However, as the genetic differences between the two, classical and the new T. saginata were very small, experts from USA and Australia recommended Fan not describing it as a new species (Zarlenga et al, 1991;Bowles and McManus, 1994;McManus and Bowles, 1994;Simanjuntak et al, 1997;Ito et al, , 2004Ito et al, , 2005. Finally, it was described as T. asiatica by other Korean group (Eom and Rim, 1993;Eom, 2006).…”
Section: Outcrossing Of Closely Related Two Species T Saginata and mentioning
confidence: 97%