2017
DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.22.5.055002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and correction of the false-discovery rates in resting state connectivity using functional near-infrared spectroscopy

Abstract: , "Characterization and correction of the false-discovery rates in resting state connectivity using functional near-infrared spectroscopy," J. Biomed. Opt. 22(5), 055002 (2017), doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.5.055002. Abstract. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a noninvasive neuroimaging technique that uses low levels of red to near-infrared light to measure changes in cerebral blood oxygenation. Spontaneous (resting state) functional connectivity (sFC) has become a critical tool for cognitive neuroscie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
117
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(121 reference statements)
2
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not uncommon to observe a several-fold difference in the signal-to-noise ratio in measurements between areas with little hair (e.g., the forehead) and those with hair or thicker bone structure (e.g., the occipital). The use of statistical models whose assumptions do not match these properties often results in unacceptable false-discovery and uncontrolled type-I errors.As our group has reviewed in several recent publications [9,10,[15][16][17][18], these noise features and unique statistical properties of fNIRS data need to be properly considered and will be briefly summarized in this publication in the context of a new fNIRS analysis toolbox.The primary rationale for the development of the AnalyzIR (pronounced "an-a-lyze-er") toolbox was to create a statistical analysis package to specifically address the properties of fNIRS data. This toolbox was designed to capture and preserve as much of this fNIRS-specific information and noise as possible through the entire analysis pipeline such that first-and higher-level statistical analysis methods could use this information in statistical models by utilizing covariance whitening, accounting for dependent noise terms, and using robust statistical methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not uncommon to observe a several-fold difference in the signal-to-noise ratio in measurements between areas with little hair (e.g., the forehead) and those with hair or thicker bone structure (e.g., the occipital). The use of statistical models whose assumptions do not match these properties often results in unacceptable false-discovery and uncontrolled type-I errors.As our group has reviewed in several recent publications [9,10,[15][16][17][18], these noise features and unique statistical properties of fNIRS data need to be properly considered and will be briefly summarized in this publication in the context of a new fNIRS analysis toolbox.The primary rationale for the development of the AnalyzIR (pronounced "an-a-lyze-er") toolbox was to create a statistical analysis package to specifically address the properties of fNIRS data. This toolbox was designed to capture and preserve as much of this fNIRS-specific information and noise as possible through the entire analysis pipeline such that first-and higher-level statistical analysis methods could use this information in statistical models by utilizing covariance whitening, accounting for dependent noise terms, and using robust statistical methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input of the connICA method are the functional connectivity matrices obtained for each participant, which were computed based on a robust Pearson’s correlation approach as recommended in Santosa et al, 2017. A high degree of similarity was observed at the individual and at the group level in the configuration of the functional connectivity matrices (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain imaging techniques are extremely sensitive to motion induced artifacts that are commonly observed in acquisitions on awake participants. Collecting RSFC data from awake infants considerably degrades the reliability of the inferred temporal correlations between voxel or channel time courses (Santosa et al, 2017). Because our goal was to collect high quality and reliable RSFC data, we decided to test participants during natural sleep only, which consequently also allowed us to perform longer recordings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations