2019
DOI: 10.1364/oe.27.009516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and compensation of apodization phase noise in silicon integrated Bragg gratings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, since an apodisation scheme based on variation of the grating sidewall amplitude was employed, residual ripples in the grating reflectivity and group delay spectra are still apparent. Grating coupling coefficient apodisation schemes that more effectively reduce the spectral ripple of the device, and can be fabricated within nanometric tolerances, have recently been demonstrated using phase based methods [10,16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, since an apodisation scheme based on variation of the grating sidewall amplitude was employed, residual ripples in the grating reflectivity and group delay spectra are still apparent. Grating coupling coefficient apodisation schemes that more effectively reduce the spectral ripple of the device, and can be fabricated within nanometric tolerances, have recently been demonstrated using phase based methods [10,16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are applied in a large variety of applications, including, optical filtering [1,2], sensing [3], laser cavity feedback [4] and all-optical signal processing [5,6]. A wide range of device geometries have been demonstrated in order to exercise control over the grating optical characteristics, namely the filter bandwidth [7], ripple [8], extinction and dispersion [2,9,10]. In turn, the optical characteristics of the grating can be designed through the coupling coefficient, κ, and the grating Bragg wavelength, λB, as a function of the propagation length [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For this, we first model the waveguide-effective indices as a function of wavelength and waveguide width using a commercial mode solver (Lumerical MODE). Then, we create a waveguide width profile w ( z ) along the optical axis and map this into a dispersive effective index profile n eff (z,λ) = n eff (λ) + d n ( z ) + i * k , where n eff (λ) accounts for the waveguide dispersion, d n ( z ) accounts for the sidewall modulation (empirically scaled down by 2.3 for the best agreement between our 1D approximation and real 3D nanowires as in ref ), and the imaginary component k accounts for the nominal propagation loss (∼2.5 dB/cm) of a standard nanowire. This is performed for both type-A and type-B structures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%