2015
DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2015.80.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and Analysis of Porosity and Pore Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
503
1
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 830 publications
(524 citation statements)
references
References 559 publications
(533 reference statements)
12
503
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, one could use the pore equivalent diameter in shape analysis to indicate the degree of pore heterogeneity/asymmetry based on rod-like shapes, which is equal to 6.70, 18.58, and 25.44 % for samples S 1 , S 2 , and S 3 . As discussed in the literature (Anovitz and Cole, 2015;Chang et al, 2006;Okazaki et al, 2014), a number of pore form factors have been used to quantify pore shapes that might be correlated to the macroscopic properties of sedimentary rocks. Among these factors, flatness, elongation, and roundness are commonly used.…”
Section: Quantifying Shapes Of Pore Ganglia and Detached Pore Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, one could use the pore equivalent diameter in shape analysis to indicate the degree of pore heterogeneity/asymmetry based on rod-like shapes, which is equal to 6.70, 18.58, and 25.44 % for samples S 1 , S 2 , and S 3 . As discussed in the literature (Anovitz and Cole, 2015;Chang et al, 2006;Okazaki et al, 2014), a number of pore form factors have been used to quantify pore shapes that might be correlated to the macroscopic properties of sedimentary rocks. Among these factors, flatness, elongation, and roundness are commonly used.…”
Section: Quantifying Shapes Of Pore Ganglia and Detached Pore Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured slag SA is sensitive to measurement method; 22) at the μm to mm scale the PSD and roundness are the primary features, at the nm to μm scale surface roughness and porosity (ϕ) are the dominant features. The contribution of ϕ to SA is dependent on the average pore diameter (ϕ D ); equivalent ϕ with a smaller ϕ D necessitates a longer total pore length and a larger potential SA due to the faster increase in volume over surface area for an expanding sphere.…”
Section: Surface Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of methods have been developed over the past decades to determine porosity, pore morphology and pore size distribution, each having a characteristic pore size range (Anovitz and Cole, 2015). Some common direct approaches include gas expansion techniques such as helium pycnometry (He-pycnometry) and Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP) (Anovitz and Cole, 2015;Tiab and Donaldson, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some common direct approaches include gas expansion techniques such as helium pycnometry (He-pycnometry) and Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP) (Anovitz and Cole, 2015;Tiab and Donaldson, 2015). These techniques both yield information on the bulk interconnected porosity in 3D volumes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%