Characteristics of US hospitals using extraordinary collections actions against patients for unpaid medical bills: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aims to characterise and evaluate the largest 100 hospitals in the USA that have adopted aggressive collection tactics to pursue patients with unpaid medical bills, such as lawsuits, wage garnishments and liens.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingWe examined state and county court record systems to measure the magnitude and prevalence of these practices at the largest 100 hospitals in the UA between 1 January 2018 and 31 July 2020.Main outcomes measuresThe main outcome of this study was the number of lawsuits, wage garnishments and liens. A secondary outcome was the characterisation of a hospital’s safety, charitability, size and financial practices.ResultsBetween 1 January 2018 and 31 July 2020, 26 hospitals filed 38 965 court actions (lawsuits, wage garnishments and liens) against patients for unpaid medical debt. For 16 of 26 hospitals, the dollar amount pursued in the court claim was available for 100% of cases, totalling US$71.8 million. The average aggregate amount sought by hospital lawsuits during the study period was US$4.5 million. Three hospitals filed US$56.2 million in amounts pursued in court, or 78.3% of the total amount pursued by all hospitals in the sample. In the remaining 74 hospitals, the study team did not identify extraordinary collection actions through the court system.ConclusionsStandardised medical debt collections best practices and metrics of medical debt collections quality are needed to increase public accountability for hospitals, particularly non-profit hospitals. There is a need to re-evaluate Internal Revenue Service rules pertaining to non-profit hospitals’ tax-exempt status to ensure tax-exempt hospitals provide community benefits commensurate with the value of tax exemption.

Arizona’s debt collection reform—a small step towards health justice

“…Proposition 209 does, however, make it somewhat less lucrative for healthcare providers to pursue patients for unpaid bills. A 2022 study of the 100 largest US hospitals found that only 26 of them were using court processes such as wage garnishments to pursue patients’ medical debts 10. In addition to naming and shaming the minority of hospitals that still pursue aggressive debt collection (as the laws allow), reforms such as proposition 209 may discourage hospitals from doing so, since they stand to recover less.…”

Medical Debt and the Mental Health Treatment Gap Among US Adults

“…Medical debt in the US has soared in recent decades, coinciding with hospitals’ gravitation away from charity care and toward aggressive debt collection tactics, including wage garnishment, bank account seizures, property liens, and lawsuits . Past literature suggests that inability to pay medical debt may cause patients to delay or forgo needed care .…”

The effects of price transparency and debt collection policies on intentions to consume recommended health care: A randomized vignette experiment

“…Some hospitals have been named and shamed in unfavorable news coverage and then appear to change their practices (Paturzo et al, 2021). Indeed, it appears that some hospitals do not attempt to collect medical debts generally, or at least not against low‐income patients (Hashim et al, 2022). These hospitals will not sell debt to a medical collections agency and will not sue for failure to pay.…”