2019
DOI: 10.5846/stxb201811182499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of two comprehensive assessment methods for water quality based on different evaluation criteria and their applications in aquatic environment management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The score and weight of each indicator are determined on the basis of a large number of previous research results and the degree of harm to water health. The values of C i and P i in this study are listed in Table 1 [20][21][22][23]. According to the WQI value, water quality can be classified into five levels as follows: excellent [90-100], good [70-90), medium [50-70), poor [25-50), very poor [0-25).…”
Section: Water Quality Index (Wqi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The score and weight of each indicator are determined on the basis of a large number of previous research results and the degree of harm to water health. The values of C i and P i in this study are listed in Table 1 [20][21][22][23]. According to the WQI value, water quality can be classified into five levels as follows: excellent [90-100], good [70-90), medium [50-70), poor [25-50), very poor [0-25).…”
Section: Water Quality Index (Wqi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu Qi et al evaluated the water quality of Yixun River by using two comprehensive evaluation methods of water quality health assessment and water quality index. It is determined that the two water quality comprehensive evaluation methods of ETI and WQI play an important role in the evaluation of the management effect of the basin after long‐term management (Liu et al, 2019). Taking Tanghe Reservoir as the research object, Tian Yu et al used principal component extraction (PCA) to extract the main pollution factors of monitoring factors, and used WQI min model to evaluate the water quality of Tanghe Reservoir, reflecting the seasonal variation characteristics and main pollution sources of Tanghe Reservoir water quality (Tian et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common method for evaluating water quality is single factor assessment, yet it can easily lead to biased evaluation findings that do not accurately represent the state of lake water quality overall (Li et al, 2016; Zhang et al, 2021). While the comprehensive assessment method yields more complex conclusions than the single factor assessment, it is nevertheless straightforward and easy to grasp (Hwang et al, 2020; Liu et al, 2019). Liu Qi et al evaluated the water quality of Yixun River by using two comprehensive evaluation methods of water quality health assessment and water quality index.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water quality monitoring is a prerequisite for the successful management of a healthy lake. Choosing a fast and effective method to survey the water quality in lakes can help in understanding the water environment, which is key in determining the appropriate pollution control strategies that need to be applied (Liu et al, 2019). Remote sensing, an emerging technological tool, can collect the physical parameters of geological features on large spatial and temporal scales (Song et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%