2011
DOI: 10.2112/jcoastres-d-10-00192.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of the Shoreline Change along Florida Sandy Beaches with an Example for Palm Beach County

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In an application to Narrabeen beach, Sydney, Australia, the authors concluded that the Bruun Rule was very conservative (e.g., overestimated recession), yielding estimates for the year 2100 with less than an 8% probability of exceedance. Absalonsen and Dean (2011) analyzed the long-term (about 140 years) shoreline changes on the east and west coasts of Florida. Although the focus was not the Bruun Rule, it was found that prior to beach nourishment (about 100 years of data), the average shoreline change rates on the east and west coasts of Florida were + 13 cm/yr and − 7 cm/yr, respectively.…”
Section: The Bruun Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an application to Narrabeen beach, Sydney, Australia, the authors concluded that the Bruun Rule was very conservative (e.g., overestimated recession), yielding estimates for the year 2100 with less than an 8% probability of exceedance. Absalonsen and Dean (2011) analyzed the long-term (about 140 years) shoreline changes on the east and west coasts of Florida. Although the focus was not the Bruun Rule, it was found that prior to beach nourishment (about 100 years of data), the average shoreline change rates on the east and west coasts of Florida were + 13 cm/yr and − 7 cm/yr, respectively.…”
Section: The Bruun Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shorelines erode principally by natural imprints like coastal storms, sudden weather-related events, sea level rise, changes in sediment supply, and human imprints/ modifications like beach nourishment, engineering structures (e.g., Absalonsen & Dean, 2011;Dickson et al, 2007;Nicholls & Cazenave, 2010;Woodroffe & Murray-Wallace, 2012). The consequence of human activities on rates of shoreline migration encourages beach erosion.…”
Section: Anthropogenic Influences and Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inability to understand and predict shoreline variability can result in the misinterpretation of coastal change scenarios, and affect (directly or indirectly) decision-making and subsequent design of intervention plans (Stive et al, 2002). So far, the variability in shoreline position remains a reliable proxy to describe the overall coastal or beach changes (Absalonsen & Dean, 2011;Bouvier et al, 2017;Oyedotun, 2016Oyedotun, , 2017. Shoreline dynamicity/variability has often been used to study coastal changes at short (days to seasons, e.g., Pearre & Puleo, 2009;Stive et al, 2002) or long (decades to centuries, e.g., Harley, Turner, Short, & Ranasinghe, 2010;Goble & MacKay, 2013) timescales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, average rates of shoreline change were approximately zero between the mid-1800s and the 1970s, even though net change along the islands ranged from 9 m (30 ft) of erosion to 9 m (30 ft) of deposition. Between the 1970s and 2000s, beach nourishment was an integral component of beach management along the islands, and net deposition prevailed at an average rate of about 0.9 m/year (3.0 ft/year) (Figure 6.36) (data from Absalonsen and Dean 2011). Although beach erosion hot spots are common along the islands and beach nourishment has been successful at mitigating erosion, Davis (2011b) indicates that natural accretion has occurred in several places along the islands.…”
Section: Central West Florida Barrier Islandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, net shoreline recession of À0.1 m/year (À0.3 ft/year) was recorded for this 300-km (186-mi) coastal segment. Between the 1970s/1980s and 2000s, sand nourishment was imposed along a number of beaches (FDEP 2008), contributing to a shift in net shoreline change to 0.1 m/ year (0.3 ft/year) (Absalonsen and Dean 2011) (Figure 6.44).…”
Section: Ms (mentioning
confidence: 99%