Characteristics of the medical malpractice cases against orthopedists in China between 2016 and 2017

Abstract

Background This study aimed to identify the most frequent reasons for orthopedic medical malpractice, gain insight into the related patient demographics and clinical characteristics, and identify the independent factors associated with it. Methods We collected and analyzed the demographic and injury characteristics, hospital levels and treatments, medical errors, and orthopedist’s degree of responsibility for the patients who were subject to orthopedic medical malpractice at our institution. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with the orthopedist’s degree of responsibility in the medical malpractice cases. Results We included 1922 cases of medical malpractice in the final analysis. There were 1195 and 727 men and women, respectively (62.2% and 37.8%, respectively). Of the total patients, 1810, 1038, 1558, 1441, and 414 patients (94.2%, 54.0%, 81.1%, 75.0%, and 21.5%, respectively) were inpatients, had closed injuries, underwent surgery, were trauma cases, and had preoperative comorbidities, respectively. Most medical malpractice cases were in patients with fractures and spinal degenerative disease (1229 and 253 cases; 63.9% and 13.2%, respectively), and occurred in city-level hospitals (1006 cases, 52.3%), which were located in the eastern part of china (1001, 52.1%), including Jiangsu and Zhejiang (279 and 233 cases, 14.52% and 52.1%, respectively). Between 2016 and 2017, the orthopedist’s degree of responsibility in medical malpractice claims were deemed as full, primary, equal, secondary, and minor in 135, 654, 77, 716, and 340 orthopedists (7.0%, 34.0%, 4.0%, 37.3%, and 17.7%). Most medical errors made by orthopedists in cases of medical malpractice were related to failure to supervise or monitor cases, improper performance of procedures, and failure to instruct or communicate with the patient (736, 716, and 423 cases; 38.3%, 37.3%, and 22.0%, respectively). The multivariate analysis found that patients with preoperative comorbidities, who sustained humerus injuries, who were aged ≥65 years, who were treated by doctors who failed to supervise or monitor them, and who were treated at the provincial and city level hospitals were more likely to claim that the orthopedist bore a serious degree of responsibility in the medical malpractice case. Conclusions Our results provide detailed information on the plaintiff demographics, clinical characteristics, and factors associated with medical malpractice. Medical malpractice is related to poor treatment outcomes. The first preventative measure that is required is a comprehensive improvement in the medical staff quality, mainly through medical ethics cultivation, and professional ability and technique training. Additionally, failure to supervise or monitor cases was the leading cause of medical malpractice and one of the factors that led to orthopedists bearing an equal and higher responsibility for medical malpractice. Orthopedists should improve patient supervision, especially when treating older patients and those with preoperative comorbidities and humerus injuries.

Analysis of medical malpractice liability disputes related to novel antineoplastic drugs and research on risk prevention and control strategies

“…The appraisers of the medical association are composed of more than three experts in the expert database, including clinical experts in relevant disciplines and one forensic expert. The identification procedures of the medical association can refer to the literature published by Hongzhi Lv et al [ 34 ]. As of October 1, 2018, the implementation of RPHMD further clarified the identification status of the medical association.…”

Spine-Related Malpractice Claims in China: A 2-year National Analysis

“…It should be noted that, however, during the inspected time frame, the malpractice claims in Jiangsu and Zhejiang were more inclined to resolving through medical associations than other appraisal approaches, compared with other provinces in China. 18 …”

A machine learning-based predictive model of causality in orthopaedic medical malpractice cases in China

“…We summarized the previous literature reports [14,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31], after fully understanding those common factors and considering the reality of medical malpractice cases in China, and divided the influencing factors on the degree of causality into medical factors (91 technical faults and 29 non-technical faults) and 10 patient factors (S1 Table ). Regarding the attribution of medical malpractice, it is generally observed that an increased number of affirmative responses in medical factors correlates with a higher degree of hospital liability in the case.…”